switched from 1.0mg to 2.4mg and fatigue got better, not worse
The title is the argument: switched from 1.0mg to 2.4mg and fatigue got better, not worse. Here is the rest of it.
Numbers, in the order they matter: 1.0mg and 2.4mg.
The fatigue turned out to be that I was eating about a third of what I thought I was. Tracked it for a week and the mystery evaporated.
Mine settled at week 76 and has not come back since, across two more steps.
Research-use-only material is not approved for human use and nothing here should be read as a recommendation to use it.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Hair shedding after significant weight loss is a telogen effect that follows the rate of loss. It is not specific to these compounds and it resolves.
smaller meals, earlier, is the boring advice that works
a rough fortnight at each step is normal, a rough three months is not
nobody warns you about how much of this is timing rather than dose
This one needs a clinician rather than a comment section, and we have said so in the thread rather than removing it.
Disagree. Severe abdominal pain is not on the list of things to wait out, and this board should not be treating it as one.
Yes. Holding the dose is a real option and it does not mean you have failed at anything.
Constipation is mostly reduced intake plus reduced fluid, not a direct effect. That is why the boring fibre and water answer keeps working.
How long has it been going on for now?
Small fix — the shedding follows the rate of weight loss, not the compound, and it is temporary.
Correction: that is a known effect of reduced intake rather than a direct drug effect. The distinction matters because the fix is different.