regain — my 2-week log, condensed into one table
The title is the argument: regain — my 2-week log, condensed into one table. Here is the rest of it.
Withdrawal studies across this class consistently show substantial regain after discontinuation, with appetite typically returning before weight changes. That is a description of the pharmacology of a chronic condition.
Why the first fortnight tells you nothing.
With a week-long half-life, exposure declines over several weeks after a final dose rather than ending with it. So the first two weeks after stopping are still a tail of the previous state, and the stability people report in that window is not evidence about the months after it.
The reports here are fairly consistent: appetite noticeably different somewhere in the second month, weight following later, and the trajectory strongly influenced by whether the habits from the losing phase survived. That is not a prediction for anybody in particular, and it is not a schedule — it is the shape of what members describe, which is the most this board can honestly offer.
Preparing to stop, as described by people here who have done it.
Write down where you are first: dose, date, weight, waist, and an honest note about how appetite feels. That page is what makes the following six months interpretable rather than a fog of impressions.
Decide in advance what you are watching for and over what period — appetite in the first month, weight over three, and a specific threshold at which you would want to revisit the decision. Have the conversation with a clinician before rather than after.
None of that is a schedule. It is a way of arriving at whatever happens next with information rather than with a vague sense of how it is going.
Corrections welcome, especially the pedantic ones. Pedantry is how this board earns its reputation.
best — the order this archive was captured in
With a week-long half-life, exposure declines over several weeks after the last dose rather than stopping with it. The lag is why the first fortnight is uninformative.
Left up. It is honest about the reason for stopping and about the timeline.
Not convinced. Two weeks of stable weight is not evidence of anything yet.
Yes — the withdrawal literature is consistent and it is a pharmacological finding, not a moral one.
watch appetite, not the scale, for the first month
Careful — interval stretching and dose reduction are different interventions and your post uses them interchangeably.
Push back: that is a taper schedule aimed at another member and this board does not host those.
coming back later is allowed and it is common
stretching to ten days then twelve is the pattern people report
stretching to ten days then twelve is the pattern people report
This is the sentence that reframes the whole board. Appetite first, scale later.
Stretching the interval or reducing the dose?
- 1With a week-long half-life, exposure declines over several weeks after the…12 comments in this branch · started by u/priya_weiss