[Question] how do you actually verify Wegovy
how do you actually verify Wegovy. I am not trying to be the "source?" guy. I would just like a source.
My stall was eleven weeks. Eleven. Then it moved again without me changing anything at all.
The appetite thing was the surprise. I expected to feel full. What I got was simply not thinking about food between meals.
First month I lost almost nothing and nearly quit. Month two and three were where it all happened.
If two or three other people have done the same thing we might actually learn something. Alone it is an anecdote.
best — the order this archive was captured in
STEP-1 ran 68 weeks and landed just under 15% mean body weight change on 2.4mg. It is an average of a wide distribution, not a target you have missed.
dose day drift of a day either way is fine, the curve barely notices
Leaving this up. It is a check-in, it has numbers, and it is honest about being one person.
The weekly interval comes out of the half-life — roughly a week — so you are on a smooth curve rather than a series of spikes. That is also why moving your day slightly does very little.
Sceptical of the mechanism you are proposing. Gastric emptying slows, it does not stop, and the timings you describe do not follow from it.
Minor fix — the half-life is about a week, not about a day. The rest of your point stands.
Minor fix — the half-life is about a week, not about a day.
Adding one thing to this: the appetite effect and the scale run on separate clocks, so both halves can be true at once.
Are you measuring anything other than weight? Waist is usually the one that keeps moving.
Cosigning. The appetite change and the scale change ran about three weeks apart for me too.
Weight change and appetite change are different endpoints on different timescales. Conflating them is where most of the confusion on this board starts.
Yes. Week 59 is when almost everybody writes the "is it still working" post, and almost everybody is fine.
protein first, then everything else gets easier
Same. I sat at 1.7mg for three months because it was working and there was nothing to fix.
This matches me almost exactly, right down to the food noise showing up on the second day and being gone by the fourth.
This matches me almost exactly, right down to the food noise showing up on the second day and being gone by the fourth.
Right, and the timescale is the bit that keeps getting lost. Judge a step at a month, not at a weekend.
nausea that arrives on day two and fades by day four is the standard shape
the appetite signal and the scale move on different clocks
Disagree. 2.4 is the top of the label, not the goal, and "everyone ends up there" is just survivorship in the posts you read.
Agreed, and the bit people skip is that the ladder is a tolerance ladder. It is not a potency ranking.
Small correction: 2.4mg is the maintenance ceiling on the label, not the starting maintenance dose. The distinction matters for anyone reading this later.
stalling at 2.4mg is information, not a verdict
- 1The weekly interval comes out of the half-life — roughly a week — so you are…7 comments in this branch · started by u/rafael_ostergaard
- 2nausea that arrives on day two and fades by day four is the standard shape7 comments in this branch · started by u/slow_logbook_notes