GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
3.1k
c/progresspics·posted 8 months ago by u/andres_restrepo

someone explain goal to me like I have not read a paper in years

Results Clean Column ×7 Slow Clap ×3 Long Haul ×3

someone explain goal to me like I have not read a paper in years, and I want the answer with the reasoning attached rather than just the conclusion.

Why this board is text only, since new members ask every week.

A photograph invites comparison on things nobody can control — lighting, posture, where you carry weight, what you looked like before any of this. Text invites description of what changed for you: the jacket, the stairs, the measurement, the month it took.

The result is a board where the posts are about people’s actual experience rather than about images, and where nobody is competing on the wrong axis. It was a deliberate choice, it has been challenged periodically, and every time it has been kept.

Nobody noticed for months. Then several people noticed in the same fortnight, which was strange and quite nice.

Wrote down one non-scale thing every week. Reading a year of those back was more affecting than any number.

That is everything I have. The rest is opinion and I have tried to keep it out.

4,927 up / 1,868 down73% upvoted23 commentsid lrl0l02 Nov 2025

23 comments

20 in this archive, depth 6

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/units_not_mgsyringe math695 points·8 months ago

Nothing on this board is medical advice, and rate, target and method are questions for somebody who knows your history.

replysharereportpermalink
u/andres_restrepoOP311 points·8 months ago·edited

a milestone is whatever you decide it is

replysharereportpermalink
u/yara_lindholm81 points·8 months ago

Stopped reading the fastest posts here for a month and my mood improved considerably.

replysharereportpermalink
u/sigrid_kaufmann411 points·8 months ago·edited

Not convinced comparison helps here. The people posting the fastest results are the tail of a distribution, not the middle.

replysharereportpermalink
u/andres_restrepoOP312 points·8 months ago

Is the goal you set at the start still the goal?

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (3) →
u/gentle_correctionMOD337 points·8 months ago

Nobody has to post a starting weight, and comments demanding one get removed.

replysharereportpermalink
u/kaplan_meier_kim149 points·8 months ago

goal weights chosen at week one are usually guesses

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]111 points·8 months ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/rosa_almeida162 points·8 months ago

How long was the stall before it moved?

replysharereportpermalink
u/wanjiru_osei69 points·8 months ago

measurements beat photographs for actually tracking anything

replysharereportpermalink
u/dose_diary_danalog keeper32 points·8 months ago

Rate of change is not a virtue. Slower trajectories are as durable as fast ones and are considerably better represented on this board than the front page suggests.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rasmus_mensah163 points·8 months ago

the first person to notice was me, months after it started

replysharereportpermalink
u/thyroid_tangent146 points·8 months ago·edited

Careful — that reads as advice about what someone else should do, and this board is for describing your own.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ferran_mensah82 points·8 months ago

Agreed that goal weights picked at the start are guesses. Mine was, and I revised it twice.

replysharereportpermalink
u/reta_and_regret47 points·8 months ago

Same. Comparison ruined about three months for me until I stopped reading the fastest posts.

replysharereportpermalink
u/andres_restrepo0 points·8 months ago

Same.

Slight disagreement: that is a month, not a plateau, and calling it one makes it heavier than it is.

replysharereportpermalink
u/gentle_correctionnice about it0 points·8 months ago·edited

The first thing I noticed was a jacket doing up. The scale had been flat for three weeks at that point.

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/progresspics

Progress posts with no images, by design. Starting point, current point, timeframe, dose history, what changed besides the scale. Text-only removes the comparison trap, the body-shaming pile-on and the entire question of who owns a photo of your torso.

51kmembers
62submissions
May 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/progresspics rules
  1. No images. None. Not even redacted ones. This is the whole point of the community.
  2. Include timeframe and starting point or it reads as a brag with no information.
  3. No commenting on anybody's body. Comment on the process.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.