[Lab] split one vial across Medutest and Janoshik — 97.6% and 95.1%
split one vial across Medutest and Janoshik — 97.6% and 95.1%. That is the headline. The document, the batch and the service are below so you can argue with the method rather than with me.
Pulling the figures out of the title: 97.6% and 95.1%. All of it is written down as it happened rather than reconstructed.
BCH BPC, batch matched the paperwork, PeptideMeter came back 99.6% against a claimed 99.0%. Paid for it myself, posting it because the log is only worth anything if people do.
A series across separate lots estimates a process. Repeat tests on one lot estimate the measurement. Both are useful and they answer different questions.
Ask me anything specific. Anything general I will probably get wrong.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Date of analysis anchors the result to a manufacturing period. A two-year-old result is evidence about two years ago and should be read that way.
How many separate lots does your series cover?
Fourth lot from the same supplier in the log now and the band has been tight the whole way. That consistency is the actual finding.
Is that the same lot as the one in the thread from last month?
date of analysis matters as much as the number
I would not post that as a finding. It is a single result and the template asks you to say so.
Do you have the trace, or only the summary?
Cosigning on saying who paid. It is the whole basis on which this log is worth anything.
Cosigning on saying who paid.
This is why the template has a batch field. Without it the result is about a vial nobody can identify.
one result is a data point, agreement between two services is evidence
Correcting myself: I quoted net peptide content against somebody else’s area percent. Not a comparison.
area percent unless the report says otherwise
Which service, and did you pay for it yourself?
Did the vial lot match the paperwork lot?
the trend across lots is worth more than any single figure
- 1Do you have the trace, or only the summary?10 comments in this branch · started by u/throwaway_44b1