GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [PSA] test results are not what most of this community thinks it is — 57 comments in the full submission. View in context.
5.9k
c/labresults·submitted 2 years ago by u/mariam_cabrera

[PSA] test results are not what most of this community thinks it is

Labbranch of 9 comments

Explainer, as requested in the last thread: test results are not what most of this community thinks it is. On inter-lab disagreement, which generates more heat here than anything else. Two services running different gradients, integrating differently, at possibly different wavelengths, will not produce identical…

Read the full submission and all 57 comments →

This branch

9 comments, started 2 years ago
u/phase_two_pete69 points·2 years ago

Sent a vial in specifically to check a supplier’s claim after a good experience. It matched. Boring result, worth logging.

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]52 points·2 years ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/slow_logbook_ftw16 points·2 years ago

say whether you paid for it yourself

replysharereportpermalink
u/camila_mensa12 points·2 years ago

Is that the same lot as the one in the thread from last month?

replysharereportpermalink
u/edit_for_clarity4 points·2 years ago

date of analysis matters as much as the number

replysharereportpermalink
u/yannick_barros-29 points·2 years ago

three lots beats three tests on one lot

replysharereportpermalink
u/insulin_syringe_ian1 point·2 years ago·edited

three lots beats three tests on one lot

This is why the template has a batch field. Without it the result is about a vial nobody can identify.

replysharereportpermalink
u/mod_ambulatoryadmin43 points·2 years ago

vendor, compound, batch, service, result — that is the template

replysharereportpermalink
u/bianca_demir24 points·2 years ago

inter-lab variance runs a point or two, plan your outrage accordingly

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/labresults

A running record of independent test results people paid for themselves. Every post follows the same shape: vendor, product, batch, testing service, method, and the number. Good results and bad results are equally welcome and get equal scrutiny.

44kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
c/labresults rules
  1. Template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result. Freeform posts get removed with a template reply.
  2. Do not editorialise in the title. Put the number in the title and the opinion in the body.
  3. Sample of one. Say so.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.