[Discussion] the lane advice in here is 2 years out of date
the lane advice in here is 2 years out of date, and I am aware this is a minority view on this board. The relevant figures are 2 years, and they come from the same log I have kept the whole time. Split one order across two months on purpose to compare summer and winter. Four days apart, same carrier, same route.…
Left up and added to the lane table. All four required fields were present, which is rarer than it should be.
Origin, destination, carrier and month?
Four observations is not a distribution. The lane tables here only became predictive once individual routes had a dozen or more reports behind them.
Agreed. Reporting by lane rather than by supplier is what made the tables here actually predictive.
the lane is the unit of analysis, not the supplier
Left up and added to the lane table.
This is why the lane table is organised the way it is. The supplier is not the unit.