GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
1.6k
c/glp1muscle·posted 1 year ago by u/long_post_larry

reading resistance training threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly

Question Cold Box ×8 The Quiet One ×3

Thinking out loud about this: reading resistance training threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly.

On comparing yourself to composition figures from trials.

Published composition data comes from supervised populations with structured protocols, standardised scanning, and analysis populations that have been defined in advance. Your two scans at a local clinic, taken in different states of hydration, are not the same measurement.

Use your own baseline. The question worth asking is whether your own trajectory is going the way you want given what you are actually doing, and the honest answer usually requires measuring protein rather than estimating it and being truthful about training frequency. Neither of those is advice — a programme and a target are things to work out with somebody who knows your history.

Some lean mass loss accompanies weight loss in any deficit. Resistance training and adequate protein intake are the two interventions with the best evidence for limiting the proportion.

DEXA has a meaningful coefficient of variation, and it differs between machines and protocols. Comparing scans from different clinics adds a systematic offset that is invisible on the report.

I will update this if the picture changes rather than quietly leaving it up.

1,895 up / 320 down86% upvoted37 commentsid 5p06kq14 Jan 2025

37 comments

30 in this archive, depth 5

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/protein_first_pnutrition232 points·1 year ago

Hydration status and fasting state affect the lean mass estimate. Standardising both is the difference between a comparison and a coin toss.

replysharereportpermalink
u/nikhil_asante192 points·1 year ago

Hydration status and fasting state affect the lean mass estimate.

Disagreeing with this line: rate alone does not preserve lean mass. The training does.

replysharereportpermalink
u/baseline_drifteranalytical155 points·1 year ago

the scale cannot distinguish tissue types and never could

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (2) →
u/mariam_cabrera143 points·1 year ago·edited

Reduced appetite makes hitting a protein target a logistics problem rather than a motivation problem, which is why the practical advice here is about timing and food choice rather than willpower.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ferran_dahlberg80 points·1 year ago

How many weeks between the two scans?

replysharereportpermalink
u/liv_dumitru-18 points·1 year ago

resistance training first, cardio if there is time left

replysharereportpermalink
u/long_post_larryOP1 point·1 year ago

Same DEXA machine both times?

replysharereportpermalink
u/stubborn_batchlist_pls1 point·1 year ago

the same DEXA machine or it is not a comparison

replysharereportpermalink
u/lina_dziedzic1 point·1 year ago

Push back: strength dropping in a deficit is not the same as lean mass loss. Related, not identical.

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]1 point·1 year ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/greta_perrin1 point·1 year ago

protein intake gets harder exactly when appetite drops

replysharereportpermalink
u/ahmed_fonseca1 point·1 year ago

Strength retention is an imperfect but free longitudinal proxy: it is affected by neural factors and by being in a deficit, so it tracks tissue change loosely rather than exactly.

replysharereportpermalink
u/sanne_novak80 points·1 year ago

Protein was the whole problem. Appetite dropped and I was eating well under target without noticing for a month.

replysharereportpermalink
u/long_post_larryOP46 points·1 year ago

Resistance training, and at what frequency?

replysharereportpermalink
u/karl_fischer_kev13 points·1 year ago

Fat-free mass index is a ratio of fat-free mass to height squared. It moves when either term does, which makes it awkward to interpret during active weight change.

replysharereportpermalink
u/pavel_kravchenko11 points·1 year ago

Kept the same programme for a year instead of changing it every six weeks. That was the change that worked.

replysharereportpermalink
u/line_demir15 points·1 year ago

nothing on this board is a training or nutrition prescription

replysharereportpermalink
u/formulary_fighterappeals47 points·1 year ago

Agreed — protein and resistance training. Everything else in these threads is a rounding error on those two.

replysharereportpermalink
u/usp_appendixcompendial40 points·1 year ago

a single DEXA is a number, two is a comparison, three is a trend

replysharereportpermalink
u/janek_ferrari31 points·1 year ago

Correction: those scans are from different machines, and the difference you are describing is within the measurement error.

replysharereportpermalink
u/long_post_larryOP24 points·1 year ago

grip strength and lift numbers are cheap longitudinal markers

replysharereportpermalink
u/hamza_zielinski14 points·1 year ago

grip strength and lift numbers are cheap longitudinal markers

Agreed — and same machine, same conditions, or the two scans are not comparable.

replysharereportpermalink
u/cold_chromatogram_only17 points·1 year ago

Small fix — that is fat-free mass, not muscle mass. The scan cannot separate them the way the post assumes.

replysharereportpermalink
u/alcohol_aversion25 points·1 year ago

That is a trial average in a supervised population and you are comparing your own scan to it.

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (4) →
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/glp1muscle

Lean-mass retention during rapid weight loss: protein targets, resistance-training minimums, DEXA and BIA measurement reality, FFMI tracking, and the sarcopenia question that nobody funded a proper trial for.

30kmembers
62submissions
Jun 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/glp1muscle rules
  1. Body-composition claims need a method. Bathroom BIA scales are not a method.
  2. Protein targets in g/kg, not "lots".
  3. No supplement selling, no coaching solicitation.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.