[Question] how do you actually verify resistance training
how do you actually verify resistance training. I am not trying to be the "source?" guy. I would just like a source.
What the evidence actually supports, stripped of the arguing.
Some lean mass is lost in any weight-loss deficit. Resistance training and adequate protein intake are the two interventions with real support for limiting the proportion. Nearly everything else discussed on this board is a rounding error on those two.
The complication specific to this site is that appetite reduction makes protein intake a logistics problem: you are being asked to eat a fixed amount of something at exactly the point when eating anything is less appealing. That is why the practical threads here are about timing and food choice rather than motivation, and why measuring intake rather than estimating it is the single most common useful correction.
How to make a DEXA comparison mean anything.
Same machine, same clinic, same protocol. Same hydration and fasting state, as far as you can manage. At least three to four months apart, because the measurement error is large relative to short-term change. Three scans rather than two, because the first pair cannot distinguish a trend from noise.
Do less than that and you have two numbers with an offset of unknown size, which people then react to by rebuilding a training programme. The free alternative — a few tracked lifts and a monthly waist measurement — is directionally informative, costs nothing, and is far harder to over-interpret.
On comparing yourself to composition figures from trials.
Published composition data comes from supervised populations with structured protocols, standardised scanning, and analysis populations that have been defined in advance. Your two scans at a local clinic, taken in different states of hydration, are not the same measurement.
Use your own baseline. The question worth asking is whether your own trajectory is going the way you want given what you are actually doing, and the honest answer usually requires measuring protein rather than estimating it and being truthful about training frequency. Neither of those is advice — a programme and a target are things to work out with somebody who knows your history.
Research-use-only material is not approved for human use and nothing here should be read as a recommendation to use it.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Some lean mass loss accompanies weight loss in any deficit. Resistance training and adequate protein intake are the two interventions with the best evidence for limiting the proportion.
Nothing here is a training or nutrition prescription. Targets and programmes are matters for somebody who knows your history and your training background.
strength retention is a decent proxy and it is free
Started weighing protein rather than estimating it. The gap between what I thought and what I ate was embarrassing.
Resistance training, and at what frequency?
Resistance training, and at what frequency?
Disagreeing with this line: rate alone does not preserve lean mass. The training does.
Disagreeing with this line: rate alone does not preserve lean mass.
Agreed — and same machine, same conditions, or the two scans are not comparable.
lean mass loss during weight loss is expected, the question is how much
protein intake gets harder exactly when appetite drops
What is protein intake actually looking like, measured rather than estimated?
Protein was the whole problem. Appetite dropped and I was eating well under target without noticing for a month.
Have the lifts held, dropped, or moved around?
nothing on this board is a training or nutrition prescription
nothing on this board is a training or nutrition prescription
This is the whole intervention. Protein and resistance training.
FFMI is a ratio and it moves when either term moves
Are you comparing against your own baseline or against a published average?
How many weeks between the two scans?
Fat-free mass index is a ratio of fat-free mass to height squared. It moves when either term does, which makes it awkward to interpret during active weight change.
[deleted]
Yes. Lean mass change during weight loss is expected; the useful question is the proportion, not whether it happens.
protein and resistance training, that is the entire intervention
protein and resistance training, that is the entire intervention
annika_fonseca is right that protein becomes a logistics problem when appetite drops.
DEXA has a real error margin and people quote it to one decimal
- 1Started weighing protein rather than estimating it. The gap between what I…8 comments in this branch · started by u/mikkel_correia
- 2Fat-free mass index is a ratio of fat-free mass to height squared. It moves…6 comments in this branch · started by u/vito_chowdhury