GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Question] how do you actually verify resistance training — 58 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.1k
c/glp1muscle·submitted 4 months ago by u/tomas_broberg

[Question] how do you actually verify resistance training

Questionbranch of 6 comments

how do you actually verify resistance training. I am not trying to be the "source?" guy. I would just like a source. What the evidence actually supports, stripped of the arguing. Some lean mass is lost in any weight-loss deficit. Resistance training and adequate protein intake are the two interventions with real…

Read the full submission and all 58 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 4 months ago
u/vito_chowdhury43 points·4 months ago·edited

Fat-free mass index is a ratio of fat-free mass to height squared. It moves when either term does, which makes it awkward to interpret during active weight change.

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]32 points·4 months ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink
u/tuva_kirchner21 points·4 months ago

Yes. Lean mass change during weight loss is expected; the useful question is the proportion, not whether it happens.

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (3) →

← back to the whole thread

About c/glp1muscle

Lean-mass retention during rapid weight loss: protein targets, resistance-training minimums, DEXA and BIA measurement reality, FFMI tracking, and the sarcopenia question that nobody funded a proper trial for.

30kmembers
62submissions
Jun 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/glp1muscle rules
  1. Body-composition claims need a method. Bathroom BIA scales are not a method.
  2. Protein targets in g/kg, not "lots".
  3. No supplement selling, no coaching solicitation.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.