c/insurancefights wiki
Everything you would otherwise have to learn by getting a post removed. Prior auth, denials, appeals, formulary exclusions. Templates inside.
wiki page · last revised 16 Jul 2026 · maintained by community volunteers
On this page
What this community is for
The paperwork war. Prior-authorisation criteria, denial reason codes, step-therapy documentation, external review, employer carve-outs, and the appeal letter templates the community has iterated on for three years. Mostly US-shaped but the tactics generalise.
c/insurancefights was created on 1 Dec 2023 and currently has 46,100 members and 95 captured submissions. It sits in the second tier of the site, which mostly affects how fast a question gets answered rather than how well.
The one-line version
Prior auth, denials, appeals, formulary exclusions. Templates inside.
Rules, and why each exists
Community rules come first, then the six site-wide rules that apply everywhere on GLP Research Hub. Community rules are enforced by the moderators listed at the bottom of this page; site rules are enforced by everyone.
- Say which country and which plan type. "Insurance" means eleven different things.
- Redact member ids and group numbers from every screenshot.
- Do not suggest misrepresenting a diagnosis. That is fraud and it gets you banned.
And the site rules, which are short on purpose:
- Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
- Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
- Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
- No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
- No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
- Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Terms you will see
Vocabulary that turns up constantly in c/insurancefights. Each links to the topic page, which collects every submission that touches it.
- prior authorization — an insurer requiring approval before it will pay.
- appeal — a formal challenge to a denial; usually fixable paperwork rather than policy.
- denial — a refusal to cover, carrying a reason code that tells you what to fix.
- formulary — the list of what a plan covers. Read the exclusions before the marketing.
- step therapy — having to fail something cheaper first, with the failure documented.
- external review — independent review after internal appeals are exhausted.
- copay — discussed frequently in this community — see the topic page for every submission that touches it.
Start here
The twelve highest-scoring submissions in this community. Not necessarily the most correct — the most agreed-with, which is a different thing, and worth remembering when you read them.
- [Question] step therapy — what am I missing here — 5.6k points, 49 comments, 2 years ago
- Spain: copay, and what it actually costs here — 5k points, 55 comments, 2 years ago
- [Discussion] can we stop arguing about appeal until somebody posts a number — 4.1k points, 45 comments, 1 year ago
- [Question] Spain — has anyone got a straight answer on denial — 3.9k points, 26 comments, 2 years ago
- the step therapy question that gets asked weekly, answered properly — 3.9k points, 65 comments, 1 year ago
- why does nobody talk about step therapy — 3.8k points, 15 comments, 1 year ago
- Germany: external review, and what it actually costs here — 3.7k points, 38 comments, 1 year ago
- someone explain external review to me like I have not read a paper in years — 3.2k points, 33 comments, 2 years ago
- unpopular opinion: most of what gets said here about denial is guesswork — 3.2k points, 58 comments, 2 years ago
- [Discussion] denial is doing more work than we give it credit for — 3.2k points, 62 comments, 1 year ago
- how much of what we believe about step therapy actually comes from prior authorization threads — 3.1k points, 9 comments, 10 months ago
- the copay thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down — 3.1k points, 52 comments, 1 year ago
Asked constantly
- [Question] step therapy — how do i document failing something cheaper
- [Question] does the copay card stack with anything or is that a myth
- [Question] the UK — has anyone got a straight answer on formulary
- [Question] how do you actually verify external review
- [Question] how do you actually verify step therapy
- unpopular opinion: most of what gets said here about appeal is guesswork
- three years of step therapy threads, summarised so you do not have to read them
- [Question] how do you actually verify appeal
- help me understand appeal, I have read the wiki twice
- [Question] how do you actually verify copay
If your question is on that list, read the answers there first. If it is not, ask it — that is what the community is for, and "this has been asked" is only a helpful reply when it comes with a link.
Who runs this
Moderation here is done by volunteers who also post as normal members. They are not clinicians, not vendors, and not paid.
- u/prior_auth_pain — Four denials, three appeals, one external review, eventually approved. Templates in my posts.
- u/formulary_fighter — Read the formulary exclusion list before you read the marketing.
- u/appeal_letter_al — My appeal letter template has been copied 200+ times. Take it, it is free.
- u/step_therapy_s — Step therapy means failing something cheaper first. Document the failure properly.
Wiki pages are community-maintained summaries, not clinical guidance. If a wiki page and your clinician disagree, your clinician wins.