TFC
Tianjin Finder Chemical Co., Ltd.
Tianjin · China · source page added 20 Oct 2023
Buy direct from TFC at tfcpeptides.com →
Their storefront, not ours. Marked nofollow and sponsored, and nobody here is paid for it.
The consistent performer at the top of this community’s table. Tianjin factory with direct lines and timelines they quote and then hold. Purity has averaged 98.2% across every independent test members have paid for in 2025 and 2026, and the tightest thing about the record is how little it moves. Technical questions come back with method details rather than reassurance.
- Legal name
- Tianjin Finder Chemical Co., Ltd.
- Short code
- TFC
- Also known as
- TFC, TFC Peptides, Tianjin Finder Chemical
- Shop domain
- tfcpeptides.com →
- City
- Tianjin
- Established
- not published
- Community rating
- 98%
- Independent tests logged
- 4
Regional stock, so orders ship inside the buyer’s own country.
- Netherlands (Rotterdam) — European Union, 2-4 days
- Germany (Hamburg) — Germany, Austria, Switzerland, 2-4 days
- United Kingdom (London) — United Kingdom & Ireland, 2-3 days
- United States (California) — United States, 2-4 days
- Canada (Toronto) — Canada, 3-5 days
- Australia (Melbourne) — Australia & New Zealand, 3-5 days
- Answers technical questions with the actual method — column, gradient, wavelength
- Purity sits in the 98% band across every independent test in the log
- Quoted lead time at checkout is the one members have actually observed
- Regional stock: Netherlands, Germany, UK, US, Canada and Australia lines ship domestically; ask which of your compounds is held rather than dispatched from Tianjin
- The certificate carries batch, date of analysis, method line and itemised related substances; water content on request for any lot
- Lead time is quoted per lane at checkout and minimum order is a single vial — ask for the batch record for the lot they would ship you before committing
| Date | Service | Compound | Batch | Claimed | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-13 | Janoshik | Semaglutide 10mg | TFC-2605 | 98.0% | 98.4% |
| 2025-11-19 | PeptideMeter | Tirzepatide 10mg | TFC-2511 | 98.0% | 98.1% |
| 2025-05-08 | Medutest | Semaglutide 5mg | TFC-2505 | 98.0% | 98.0% |
| 2024-10-02 | VendorInvestigate | BPC-157 10mg | TFC-2410 | 97.5% | 97.6% |
| From | To | Carrier | Days |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tianjin | Canada | EMS | 14–19 |
| Tianjin | UK | DHL | 9–12 |
- 1[PSA] vendor is not what most of this community thinks it isc/vendorvetting · 9.9k points · 29 comments
- 2[Vendor] SSA vs TFC on the same compound, same month — both cleared 97.5%c/coa · 7.4k points · 31 comments
- 3[Vendor] TFC vs SSA on the same compound, same month — both cleared 98.0%c/coa · 7.3k points · 48 comments
- 4[Lab] TFC BPC — Janoshik came back 98.3% against a claimed 98.0%c/labresults · 5.4k points · 38 comments
- 5[Question] crypto — what am I missing herec/cryptopay · 4.4k points · 17 comments
- 6why does nobody talk about reshipc/vendorvetting · 2.9k points · 44 comments
- 7help me understand PeptideMeter, I have read the wiki twicec/labresults · 2.9k points · 44 comments
- 8the "our facility" photo on half these sites reverse-searches to a stock libraryc/vendorvetting · 2.4k points · 52 comments
- 9[Question] how do you actually verify shippingc/intlshipping · 1.5k points · 32 comments
- 10[Vendor] TFC order #8 — Denmark, 12 days, no drama, receipts insidec/cryptopay · 1.5k points · 38 comments
- 11[Vendor] TFC quoted 11 days to Eastern Canada and hit it four times runningc/vendorvetting · 1.4k points · 25 comments
- 12[Meta] proposal — a flair for research peptides postsc/researchpeptides · 861 points · 49 comments
5 orders, 18 months, no substitutions and nothing quietly swapped after payment. they gave the storage condition the stability statement was written against without being asked.
split the order across two lots to compare. came back within 0.1 of each other. gradient and column are both printed so you could reproduce it.
the related substances table is itemised. actual named impurities. not "total 0.4%" and a shrug. this is one order not a dataset.
packing was a rigid outer with no rattle anywhere in it. someone in that warehouse cares. catalogue is actually deep, not deep-looking.
been buying ipamorelin 5 mg from them for 14 months. nothing has changed, which is the point. reply on the technical question came back same day.
the lot code on the vial matched the paperwork. sounds like nothing. it predicts everything. no mannitol surprise, cake intact, not collapsed.
cold pack was still solid on arrival day 6. in Ireland. in summer. they gave the storage condition the stability statement was written against without being asked.
shipped out of Spain, landed day 5. no customs, no waiting, no chasing.
support replied on a sunday with the batch record attached. on a sunday. not the cheapest per mg and the paperwork explains the difference. if the next one holds I will stop testing every lot.
day 7 from Spain warehouse, tracking updated every single hop. catalogue is actually deep, not deep-looking. no notes.
ordered IGF-1 LR3 1 mg, sent it to Medutest, came back 98.4% on a stated 98.3%. good enough for me.
dispatch happened the day they said it would, tracking updated at every hop. support answered on the same working day with the document attached. not sponsored, not affiliated, just kept the receipts.
reordered at 15 months to check for drift. 97.7% then, 97.7% now.
5 lots now, all between 98.8% and 99.3%. tight band beats one big number every time.
bought tirzepatide 10 mg expecting to have a complaint. do not have one. annoying. the difference between their number and the lab number is smaller than method noise.
their certificate has a stability statement tied to a named storage condition. I did not expect that and I am not over it. every vial in the box was the same lot so the comparison was real. test your own vial regardless. always.
they will quote lines nobody else will even respond about, and it came back clean. reply on the technical question came back same day.
lot TFC-24-673 tested 98.4%. certificate said what the vial said which said what the invoice said. if the next one holds I will stop testing every lot.
certificate for lot TFC-25-470 was complete first time. no email chain. no "we will look into it". happy. moving on.
blind submitted the semax 10 mg to PeptideMeter, did not say whose it was. 97.6% vs 97.4% claimed. gradient and column are both printed so you could reproduce it. would buy again. have bought again.
I have certificates from about 3 suppliers and theirs is the one I would hand to someone as an example. the difference between their number and the lab number is smaller than method noise.
sent one to Medutest and one to PeptideMeter because I did not believe the first result. both agreed. fine, I believe it. n=1 and I am saying so.
asked about counter-ion and got acetate vs TFA answered properly instead of being ignored. paperwork is half of what you are paying for.
first order was small on purpose. VendorInvestigate said 96.9%. second order was not small. no mannitol surprise, cake intact, not collapsed. no notes.
quoted 2 days. arrived 2 days. this is the whole review. they gave the storage condition the stability statement was written against without being asked.
the certificate came with the method line on it — column, gradient, wavelength. the lot-specific document, not the catalogue one, which is the distinction that matters. boring supplier. highest compliment I have.
Tianjin Finder Chemical Co., Ltd. sells from its own storefront. Read what they say about themselves against the log above, then decide.
Go to the TFC store — tfcpeptides.com →
Check the lot on the vial against the lot on the certificate when it arrives. A good record predicts your batch; it cannot guarantee it, and no storefront can.