u/step_count_stan
8,000 steps is not exercise, it is a floor. Build from there.
member · joined 6 Apr 2024
Overview — page 3 of 3
comment on the VendorInvestigate thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/vendorvetting · 186 points · 2 years ago
That is a report count, not a test count. The table lists both and they are very different numbers.
comment on help me understand method development, I have read the wiki twice in c/hplc · 13 points · 2 years ago
I would not blame the sample yet.
This is the whole methodological point of the board in one line.
comment on the A1c question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/t2dglp1 · 10 points · 2 years ago
metformin and an incretin agonist are not in competition
comment on [Results] 27 weeks on 7.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/glp1muscle · 1 points · 2 years ago
protein and resistance training, that is the entire intervention
comment on [Lab] split one vial across Janoshik and Medutest — 97.4% and 96.2% in c/vendorvetting · 212 points · 2 years ago
Minimum order and lead time — did they quote both up front?
comment on [Question] is 94.2% actually fine or am I being sold a rounding error in c/hplc · 51 points · 2 years ago
Correction: that is a tailing factor, not a plate count. Different diagnostics for different problems.
comment on chromatogram is the most under-discussed thing on this board in c/hplc · 32 points · 2 years ago
Yes. Retention time is a hypothesis about identity. Mass is the answer.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring testing at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/vendorvetting · 1 points · 2 years ago
Minimum order and lead time — did they quote both up front?
comment on how much of what we believe about HPLC actually comes from gradient threads in c/hplc · 123 points · 2 years ago
Push back: a longer run is not automatically better resolution. You are trading peak width for time and the ratio is what matters.
comment on purity — 19 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/hplc · 657 points · 2 years ago
A shoulder that does not baseline-resolve cannot be quantified honestly. You can report it as an unresolved shoulder, which is useful information, or you can develop the method until it resolves.