[Meta] the FLOW rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining
the FLOW rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining. Nothing about this affects the ranking maths, before anyone asks. Started keeping the trial identifiers straight in a note file because I kept mixing up two programmes in the same sentence. Quoted a figure here confidently, got asked whether it was…
Discontinuation rates are a tolerability result. A trial with a strong efficacy number and heavy discontinuation is telling you two things and people only quote one.
Not convinced. Cross-trial comparison between two programmes with different populations and designs is not a comparison.
Correction: SURMOUNT is the obesity programme and SURPASS is the diabetes one. The figure you quoted belongs to the other one.
Which trial, and which arm?
Yes. The appendix tables are where the subgroup and the adverse event detail actually live.
How long was the randomised phase before any extension?
What did the confidence interval look like?
Spent an evening with the appendix tables and found the subgroup detail that the entire thread had been speculating about.