[Question] is 93.7% actually fine or am I being sold a rounding error
Right: is 93.7% actually fine or am I being sold a rounding error. I paid for this one myself, nobody sent me anything, and the receipts are in the comments. The numbers the title promised, since a headline without them is worthless: 93.7%. Everything below is context for those. Vials and pens carry the same…
The four-week interval in the label is a minimum. Nothing about the pharmacology requires you to step on schedule, and the trials stepped on a calendar because trials have to.
pens and vials are the same molecule, the price is the difference
hold the dose that works, the ladder is not a leaderboard
Are you comparing yourself with the trial mean or with the people who post the most?
Small fix: SURMOUNT is the obesity programme, SURPASS is the type-2 programme. They are different endpoints and the numbers do not transfer.
That percentage is body weight change, not body fat. Different measurement, and the distinction gets lost every time.
I would separate the two claims. That the GIP arm exists is uncontroversial; that it explains your fatigue pattern is a guess.
[removed by moderator]
2.5mg is a four-week starting dose, not a maintenance dose. Worth being precise since people search these threads.
the trials titrated on a calendar, real people titrate on symptoms
Pen or vial? The step sizes available differ and it changes this answer.