GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of how much of what we believe about Mounjaro actually comes from SURMOUNT threads — 46 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1k
c/tirzepatide·submitted 1 year ago by u/ahmed_fonseca

how much of what we believe about Mounjaro actually comes from SURMOUNT threads

Side Effectsbranch of 18 comments

Slightly embarrassed to be asking this, but: how much of what we believe about Mounjaro actually comes from SURMOUNT threads. SURMOUNT-1 ran 72 weeks with the top arm around 21% mean body weight change. SURPASS is the diabetes programme and reports glycaemic endpoints, so quoting the two interchangeably is a category…

Read the full submission and all 46 comments →

This branch

18 comments, started 1 year ago
u/titration_marshalMOD95 points·1 year ago

Trial identifiers corrected in the title. SURMOUNT and SURPASS are different programmes.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ahmed_fonsecaOP68 points·1 year ago

Trial identifiers corrected in the title.

Saving this one. It is the clearest statement of the stall problem I have read here.

replysharereportpermalink
u/titration_marshalmod · c/semaglutide56 points·1 year ago

a lot of people plateau nicely at 10mg and never need 15

replysharereportpermalink
u/rania_marchand24 points·1 year ago

Agree. The GIP component is the interesting half and it barely gets discussed outside c/glp1science.

replysharereportpermalink
u/piotr_nascimento30 points·1 year ago

2.5mg is a four-week starting dose, not a maintenance dose. Worth being precise since people search these threads.

replysharereportpermalink
u/slow_logbook_ftw15 points·1 year ago

Right. And the sema-to-tirz "conversion" people post is invented. There is no published equivalence.

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (5) →
u/two_mil_or_one52 points·1 year ago

The thing nobody warned me about was how much of this is logistics — storing it, remembering it, the same day every week.

replysharereportpermalink
u/emil_barros51 points·1 year ago

Push back: "gentler than sema" is a population statement. Plenty of people on this board have the opposite experience and they are not doing it wrong.

replysharereportpermalink
u/aurel_lindqvist32 points·1 year ago

if 7.5 is working, 10 is not automatically better

replysharereportpermalink
u/alcohol_aversion18 points·1 year ago

Cosigning the four-week thing. It is a minimum interval, and treating it as a schedule to keep up with is how people end up miserable at 12.5.

replysharereportpermalink
u/cormac_pereira41 points·1 year ago

The 21% figure is a 72-week mean on the highest arm. Quoting it as what someone should expect by week 29 is not a fair reading.

replysharereportpermalink
u/graph_it_gary0 points·1 year ago

sulphur burps are the signature complaint and they are not dangerous

replysharereportpermalink
u/zeynep_zielinski1 point·1 year ago

What is the waist doing? That is usually the number still moving during a scale stall.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/tirzepatide

Tirzepatide-specific discussion: the dual-agonist pharmacology, the 2.5 → 15mg ladder, the appetite profile people describe as different from semaglutide, and the SURMOUNT/SURPASS trial programme. Comparisons with semaglutide are welcome as long as they are specific about dose equivalence being unknown.

187kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
c/tirzepatide rules
  1. "Tirz is better than sema" needs a comparator dose or it is a vibe, not a claim.
  2. Vial-splitting and self-compounding discussion stays in c/reconstitution.
  3. No pen-cracking tutorials. Discussing that people do it is fine; instructions are not.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.