[Results] A1c 9.1 → 5.4, full table, 14 months
A1c 9.1 → 5.4, full table, 14 months. Posting the boring middle of the process, because the internet is full of the start and the end and nothing else. Figures up front so nobody has to dig: 14 months. On hypoglycaemia, because the risk gets attributed to the wrong thing constantly. Incretin-based agents stimulate…
Certain conditions affect A1c independently of glycaemia. If a result looks inconsistent with the sensor data, that is a question for whoever manages your care rather than for this board.
[deleted]
Postprandial excursions flattened out first and the fasting number took months to follow. Nobody had told me to expect that order.
The diabetes and obesity programmes are separate, with different populations and different primary endpoints. Reading a result across from one to the other is not a comparison.
The diabetes and obesity programmes are separate, with different populations and different primary endpoints.
laila_wikstrom is right that the fasting number moves last. Knowing that in advance saves months of worry.
Same. The first day of a new sensor is unreliable and people rebuild their whole week around it.
Same.
Disagreeing with this line: that endpoint is from the obesity programme and does not answer the question.
Panicked over a first-day sensor reading and rebuilt my week around it. It was the sensor.