GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
3.1k
c/scamalerts·posted 1 year ago by u/britta_boateng

[PSA] fraud is not what most of this community thinks it is

PSA Clean Column ×5 Slow Clap ×1 Well Actually ×1

The one-line version is the title: fraud is not what most of this community thinks it is. The rest is why.

Never name an individual. The sidebar rule exists because the cost of being wrong falls on a person and the benefit of being right falls on nobody in particular.

Asked a new shop for a batch-specific certificate before ordering. The reply was a generic catalogue page. I did not order.

Was in a group buy that went quiet for six weeks. It resolved in the end, but the structure meant I had no visibility and no recourse the whole time.

Not medical advice, obviously, and nothing here is approved for human use. One person with a spreadsheet.

3,536 up / 445 down89% upvoted48 commentsid pad12x5 Jun 2025

48 comments

12 in this archive, depth 5

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/archived_thread_a421 points·1 year ago

Why this board insists on dates and documents rather than names.

A report that says "X is a scam" is unfalsifiable and unactionable. A report that says "ordered on this date, paid this way, asked for a batch document on this date, received this reply, nothing since" can be checked, corroborated, or corrected by somebody with a different experience.

The second kind has repeatedly turned out to be a shipping problem, a payment window, or a misread email. The first kind never turns into anything except an argument, and when it is wrong the cost falls on somebody real.

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]303 points·1 year ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/neha_mwangi436 points·1 year ago

Lost money once, years ago, to a shop that pushed hard for a decision the same day. Every time I see that pressure now I close the tab.

replysharereportpermalink
u/britta_boatengOP311 points·1 year ago

Small fix — the name you are describing is in the wider-market table with almost nothing on file, not in the documented twenty.

replysharereportpermalink
u/priya_palacios174 points·1 year ago

Yes. The thin-evidence names in the directory are thin because nobody has anything on them, which is a different statement from a warning.

replysharereportpermalink
u/aksel_jansen209 points·1 year ago

never accuse an individual, describe what happened to you

replysharereportpermalink
u/britta_boatengOP121 points·1 year ago

That is a report count, not a test count, and it changes how thin the evidence base actually is.

replysharereportpermalink
u/soren_yildiz291 points·1 year ago

pressure to decide today is the oldest signal there is

replysharereportpermalink
u/farid_kuipers319 points·1 year ago

Why this board insists on dates and documents rather than names.

Disagreeing here: that is a delay, and this board has to keep delay and intent in separate columns.

replysharereportpermalink
u/stubborn_batchlist_pls201 points·1 year ago

ask for a batch-specific document before you send anything

replysharereportpermalink
u/nordic_pricing294 points·1 year ago

the review page nobody can find on any other site is a warning

replysharereportpermalink
u/rina_bergstrom-8 points·1 year ago·edited

What dates are we talking about — order, payment, last contact?

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/scamalerts

Documented fraud: cloned storefronts, recycled COA PDFs, batch numbers appearing across unrelated vendors, fake test reports, group-buy exit scams, and the small number of patterns that account for almost all of it. Accusations without evidence are removed — not because we doubt you, but because unverifiable accusations make the community useless.

58kmembers
95submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
c/scamalerts rules
  1. Evidence required: dated screenshots, PDF metadata, order records or an independent test. No exceptions.
  2. No doxxing. Company registration details are fine; individuals are not.
  3. If a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so. We keep the record honest in both directions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.