GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Results] 45 weeks on 0.25mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring — 44 comments in the full submission. View in context.
8.3k
c/retatrutide·submitted 1 year ago by u/nikhil_asante

[Results] 45 weeks on 0.25mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring

Resultsbranch of 7 comments

Check-in as promised in the title: 45 weeks on 0.25mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring. The numbers the title promised, since a headline without them is worthless: 45 weeks and 0.25mg. Everything below is context for those. Kept a log specifically because there is so little published. It is one person and it is…

Read the full submission and all 44 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 1 year ago
u/ewan_marchand531 points·1 year ago

It is a triple agonist at the GLP-1, GIP and glucagon receptors. The glucagon arm is the genuinely novel component and it is the one with the least human outcome data behind it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/emil_agyeman159 points·1 year ago

a lot of the confident posting here is extrapolation

replysharereportpermalink
u/baseline_drifteranalytical180 points·1 year ago

Small fix — three receptors, not two. GLP-1, GIP and glucagon, and the third one is the reason this compound gets its own board.

replysharereportpermalink
u/nikhil_asanteOP115 points·1 year ago

The muscle cramps profile felt different rather than worse. Hard to describe and impossible to quantify, so take it as an impression.

replysharereportpermalink
u/solene_ilunga120 points·1 year ago

It is a triple agonist at the GLP-1, GIP and glucagon receptors.

Disagree with this specific inference. A 48-week readout does not tell you the shape of the curve after it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/yannick_barros35 points·1 year ago

Glucagon receptor agonism is associated with increased energy expenditure and with hepatic effects. That is a mechanistic story with strong preclinical support and limited phase 2 human data.

replysharereportpermalink
u/helga_vermeulen24 points·1 year ago

Correction: TRIUMPH is the phase 3 programme. The number you are quoting is from the phase 2 readout, which is a different trial.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/retatrutide

Retatrutide: GIP/GLP-1/glucagon triple agonism, the TRIUMPH programme, and the fact that most people discussing it are handling research-grade material with no human-use approval anywhere. Dose-response, heart-rate signal, and the unusually steep phase-2 weight curves get argued about here weekly.

65kmembers
130submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
c/retatrutide rules
  1. Retatrutide is not approved anywhere for human use. Posts must not read as usage instructions.
  2. Phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers. Cite the trial and the dose arm.
  3. Heart-rate and dose-escalation reports need actual measurements, not impressions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.