GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
8k
c/retatrutide·posted 2 years ago by u/iman_castellanos

small win: triple agonist stopped being a problem at week 65

Discussion Receipts ×4 Well Actually ×2 Cold Box ×3

small win: triple agonist stopped being a problem at week 65, and the part I actually want to talk about is at the bottom.

The early fullness profile felt different rather than worse. Hard to describe and impossible to quantify, so take it as an impression.

Watched heart rate on a wearable across twelve weeks because the threads said to. It moved a little and I have no idea whether that means anything.

Not medical advice, obviously, and nothing here is approved for human use. One person with a spreadsheet.

8,283 up / 291 down97% upvoted12 commentsid 1art9n20 Dec 2023

12 comments

8 in this archive, depth 3

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/nabila_bakken1.6k points·2 years ago

It is a triple agonist at the GLP-1, GIP and glucagon receptors. The glucagon arm is the genuinely novel component and it is the one with the least human outcome data behind it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/iman_castellanosOP1.1k points·2 years ago·edited

It is a triple agonist at the GLP-1, GIP and glucagon receptors.

Adding the standing caveat: none of this is approved anywhere and research material is not for human use.

replysharereportpermalink
u/arne_amankwah1.1k points·2 years ago

Nothing containing this compound is approved anywhere. Research-use-only material is not approved for human use, and that is a statement of fact rather than a disclaimer.

replysharereportpermalink
u/noor_ivaturi258 points·2 years ago

a lot of the confident posting here is extrapolation

replysharereportpermalink
u/iman_castellanosOP-2 points·2 years ago

a lot of the confident posting here is extrapolation

Disagree with this specific inference. A 48-week readout does not tell you the shape of the curve after it.

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (3) →
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/retatrutide

Retatrutide: GIP/GLP-1/glucagon triple agonism, the TRIUMPH programme, and the fact that most people discussing it are handling research-grade material with no human-use approval anywhere. Dose-response, heart-rate signal, and the unusually steep phase-2 weight curves get argued about here weekly.

65kmembers
130submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/retatrutide rules
  1. Retatrutide is not approved anywhere for human use. Posts must not read as usage instructions.
  2. Phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers. Cite the trial and the dose arm.
  3. Heart-rate and dose-escalation reports need actual measurements, not impressions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.