GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Question] timeframe — what am I missing here — 39 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.4k
c/progresspics·submitted 1 year ago by u/farid_kuipers

[Question] timeframe — what am I missing here

Discussionbranch of 7 comments

Slightly embarrassed to be asking this, but: timeframe — what am I missing here. The boring middle lasted the longest and it is the part I am most proud of. On the goal weight you set in week one. You chose it with the least information you will ever have about how this feels, what is sustainable, and what your body…

Read the full submission and all 39 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 1 year ago
u/dose_diary_danaMOD77 points·1 year ago

Removed advice aimed at another member. Describe your own experience here.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lane_map_larrylogistics111 points·1 year ago

text only here, by community rule, and it works better than you would think

replysharereportpermalink
u/rasmus_kimani38 points·1 year ago

Removed advice aimed at another member.

Slight disagreement: that is a month, not a plateau, and calling it one makes it heavier than it is.

replysharereportpermalink
u/farid_kuipersOP19 points·1 year ago

What timeframe is that over?

replysharereportpermalink
u/yara_lindholm16 points·1 year ago

nobody owes anybody a starting weight

replysharereportpermalink
u/blunt_coldbox_202423 points·1 year ago

A goal weight chosen before starting is a prediction made with the least information you will ever have. Revising it is ordinary rather than a failure.

replysharereportpermalink
u/elin_tamm11 points·1 year ago

Are you measuring anything other than weight?

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/progresspics

Progress posts with no images, by design. Starting point, current point, timeframe, dose history, what changed besides the scale. Text-only removes the comparison trap, the body-shaming pile-on and the entire question of who owns a photo of your torso.

51kmembers
62submissions
May 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/progresspics rules
  1. No images. None. Not even redacted ones. This is the whole point of the community.
  2. Include timeframe and starting point or it reads as a brag with no information.
  3. No commenting on anybody's body. Comment on the process.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.