GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Locked. A moderator closed replies on this one. It stays up because the content above the argument is worth keeping.
471
c/progresspics·posted 2 months ago by u/gentle_correction

small win: non-scale victory stopped being a problem at week 61

Non-Scale Win Well Actually ×6

Check-in as promised in the title: small win: non-scale victory stopped being a problem at week 61.

Stopped reading the fastest posts here for a month and my mood improved considerably.

Nobody noticed for months. Then several people noticed in the same fortnight, which was strange and quite nice.

Not medical advice, obviously, and nothing here is approved for human use. One person with a spreadsheet.

604 up / 133 down82% upvoted31 commentsid lrrbky8 May 2026

31 comments

23 in this archive, depth 6

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/blunt_coldbox76 points·2 months ago

Circumference measurements often continue changing during a scale plateau because composition changes are not visible on a bathroom scale.

replysharereportpermalink
u/gentle_correctionMOD45 points·2 months ago

Removed an image link. This board is text only by community rule and that has been reaffirmed twice.

replysharereportpermalink
u/gentle_correctionOPnice about it50 points·2 months ago

My goal weight at week one was a number I made up. I have revised it twice since and I am happier for it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ferran_mensah15 points·2 months ago

the timeframe matters as much as the number

replysharereportpermalink
u/gentle_correctionOPnice about it9 points·2 months ago

the first person to notice was me, months after it started

replysharereportpermalink
u/gentle_correctionOPnice about it5 points·2 months ago

Correction: 13kg over 18 months is a different claim from 13kg in a month, and the post reads as the second.

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]2 points·2 months ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/search_before_post53 points·2 months ago

38kg over 16 months and honestly the most useful marker was that stairs stopped being a decision.

replysharereportpermalink
u/kian_ferreira32 points·2 months ago

Stalled for 24 weeks and measured my waist out of stubbornness. It had moved. The scale had not.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ferran_laurent24 points·2 months ago

non-scale victories count and they are the ones people remember

replysharereportpermalink
u/elise_grimaldi9 points·2 months ago

Rate of change is not a virtue. Slower trajectories are as durable as fast ones and are considerably better represented on this board than the front page suggests.

replysharereportpermalink
u/gentle_correctionnice about it-18 points·2 months ago

Why this board is text only, since new members ask every week.

A photograph invites comparison on things nobody can control — lighting, posture, where you carry weight, what you looked like before any of this. Text invites description of what changed for you: the jacket, the stairs, the measurement, the month it took.

The result is a board where the posts are about people’s actual experience rather than about images, and where nobody is competing on the wrong axis. It was a deliberate choice, it has been challenged periodically, and every time it has been kept.

replysharereportpermalink
u/units_not_mgsyringe math1 point·2 months ago

Yes. Clothes fitting differently arrives well before the scale acknowledges anything.

replysharereportpermalink
u/wholesome_lurker33 points·2 months ago

Small correction, kindly meant: that is a range rather than a regain. Weight moves day to day in everybody.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lina_ndiaye21 points·2 months ago

Small correction, kindly meant: that is a range rather than a regain.

This is the one I would put in the sidebar. The middle is where everyone lives.

replysharereportpermalink
u/zaid_grimaldi12 points·2 months ago

That is a waist measurement, not a weight, and the thread has been comparing them as though they were the same.

replysharereportpermalink
u/dexa_twice_yearlybody comp29 points·2 months ago

I would not treat a two-kilo range as a regain. Weight varies day to day in everybody.

replysharereportpermalink
u/blunt_coldbox17 points·2 months ago

I would not treat a two-kilo range as a regain.

dexa_twice_yearly is right that the clothes tell you before the scale does.

replysharereportpermalink
u/runa_cabrera12 points·2 months ago

Same. Comparison ruined about three months for me until I stopped reading the fastest posts.

replysharereportpermalink
u/gentle_correctionnice about it21 points·2 months ago

On the goal weight you set in week one.

You chose it with the least information you will ever have about how this feels, what is sustainable, and what your body does at different points. Revising it is not moving the goalposts; it is updating a prediction, which is what you are supposed to do with predictions.

Several of the longest-standing members here have revised theirs more than once, in both directions, and describe the revision as the point at which the whole thing became manageable. What the number should be is a conversation with somebody who knows your history — but that it is allowed to change is something this board can tell you.

replysharereportpermalink
u/marta_marchand11 points·2 months ago·edited

the clothes change before the number does

replysharereportpermalink
u/anders_karlsen19 points·2 months ago

The first thing I noticed was a jacket doing up. The scale had been flat for three weeks at that point.

replysharereportpermalink
u/cold_chromatogram3111 points·2 months ago

Wrote down one non-scale thing every week. Reading a year of those back was more affecting than any number.

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/progresspics

Progress posts with no images, by design. Starting point, current point, timeframe, dose history, what changed besides the scale. Text-only removes the comparison trap, the body-shaming pile-on and the entire question of who owns a photo of your torso.

51kmembers
62submissions
May 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/progresspics rules
  1. No images. None. Not even redacted ones. This is the whole point of the community.
  2. Include timeframe and starting point or it reads as a brag with no information.
  3. No commenting on anybody's body. Comment on the process.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.