GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Rules] no referral links. not once. not ever. permanent. — 30 comments in the full submission. View in context.
612
c/meta·submitted 1 months ago by u/kasper_cabrera

[Rules] no referral links. not once. not ever. permanent.

Rulesbranch of 6 comments

no referral links. not once. not ever. permanent. This affects how posts get sorted and removed, so it belongs in the open. Complained about a rule without proposing anything and was politely pointed at this page. Fair. Argued against the strict evidence rule for a year. Then read a supplier thread on another site…

Read the full submission and all 30 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 1 months ago
u/katrin_diallo31 points·1 months ago

Agreed. Publishing the ranking formula is the difference between a feed and a black box, and it costs nothing to do.

replysharereportpermalink
u/emil_wojcik26 points·1 months ago

Not convinced by the proposal as worded. It would remove the specific thing that makes the vendor board usable.

replysharereportpermalink
u/dexa_twice_yearlybody comp23 points·1 months ago

Read the ranking formula out of scepticism and reproduced the ordering in a spreadsheet. It does what it says.

replysharereportpermalink
u/viktor_girard9 points·1 months ago

the archive-after-a-year policy is deliberate

replysharereportpermalink
u/draw_up_dizzy3 points·1 months ago

evidence rules are strict here on purpose

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]2 points·1 months ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.