c/meta · created 2 Aug 2023
The site talking about itself. Rules, moderation, ranking, wiki.
proposal: auto-flair any vendor post with no batch number. Short post, long comment section, probably. A rule-change proposal needs replacement wording because that is…
The title is the whole question — are the c/vendorvetting evidence rules too strict (no) — but here is why I am asking. The ranking functions are published: the hot…
Asked about four times a month, so here it is in one place. All four sorts are pure functions of score, up/down split and timestamp. There is no personalisation, no…
c/labresults now requires the standard template. This affects how posts get sorted and removed, so it belongs in the open. Complained about a rule without proposing…
Reference standards, analytical reagents and system-suitability material. If you are running your own method, start with a known.
Reference standardsSite governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.
Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.
peptidemeter.comSeveral compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.
Reference