GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Vendor] Homopeptide vs QSC on the same compound, same month — both cleared 98.0% — 51 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.6k
c/labresults·submitted 8 months ago by u/camila_mensa

[Vendor] Homopeptide vs QSC on the same compound, same month — both cleared 98.0%

Below Specbranch of 11 comments

Right: Homopeptide vs QSC on the same compound, same month — both cleared 98.0%. I paid for this one myself, nobody sent me anything, and the receipts are in the comments. The numbers the title promised, since a headline without them is worthless: 98.0%. Everything below is context for those. Chain of custody is why…

Read the full submission and all 51 comments →

This branch

11 comments, started 8 months ago
u/medutest_melMOD173 points·8 months ago

Retitled — the original stated a discrepancy the numbers do not show.

replysharereportpermalink
u/neha_rahimi41 points·8 months ago

I would not post that as a finding. It is a single result and the template asks you to say so.

replysharereportpermalink
u/priya_weiss13 points·8 months ago

the log is cumulative, that is the whole value of it

replysharereportpermalink
u/camila_mensaOP8 points·8 months ago

the log is cumulative, that is the whole value of it

Agreed — and two services on one batch is the strongest thing any of us can produce individually.

replysharereportpermalink
u/camila_mensaOP8 points·8 months ago·edited

Batch number and date of analysis?

replysharereportpermalink
u/camila_mensaOP22 points·8 months ago

TFC BPC, batch matched the paperwork, VendorInvestigate came back 98.7% against a claimed 98.5%. Paid for it myself, posting it because the log is only worth anything if people do.

replysharereportpermalink
u/coa_janitormod · c/coa31 points·8 months ago

This. The trend across separate lots is the number that tells you about a process rather than a vial.

replysharereportpermalink
u/yannick_barros14 points·8 months ago

This.

This is why the template has a batch field. Without it the result is about a vial nobody can identify.

replysharereportpermalink
u/jarno_cabrera5 points·8 months ago

Small fix — same supplier, different lot. The two rows in the log are not the same batch.

replysharereportpermalink
u/thyroid_tangent45 points·8 months ago

Which service, and did you pay for it yourself?

replysharereportpermalink
u/meera_oyelaran83 points·8 months ago

Right, and a point or two between services is ordinary. It is agreement, and every month somebody posts it as a scandal.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/labresults

A running record of independent test results people paid for themselves. Every post follows the same shape: vendor, product, batch, testing service, method, and the number. Good results and bad results are equally welcome and get equal scrutiny.

44kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/labresults rules
  1. Template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result. Freeform posts get removed with a template reply.
  2. Do not editorialise in the title. Put the number in the title and the opinion in the body.
  3. Sample of one. Say so.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.