[Medutest] SWB sema — 98.2%, cold chain intact, 9 days transit
Posting this because the title is the whole finding — SWB sema — 98.2%, cold chain intact, 9 days transit — and a number without its method is a rumour. The numbers the title promised, since a headline without them is worthless: 98.2% and 9 days. Everything below is context for those. Have now spent more on testing…
Merged with the other thread on the same batch so the results sit together.
Fourth lot from the same supplier in the log now and the band has been tight the whole way. That consistency is the actual finding.
Push back: three tests on one lot is one lot. It tells you about that lot and almost nothing about the next one.
Yes — date of analysis, because a result from two years ago describes a different manufacturing month.
Merged with the other thread on the same batch so the results sit together.
peptidemeter_pat is right that the band matters more than the peak. Consistency across lots is the finding.
if you are going to test, test the thing you actually received
[deleted]
net peptide content if the report gives it, and say which you are quoting
peptidemeter_pat is right that the band matters more than the peak.
Adding the boring but useful bit: say whether you paid for it. It is the basis of the whole log.
Adding the boring but useful bit: say whether you paid for it.
Disagreeing with this line: that gap is ordinary variance, not a contradiction between the lab and the certificate.
results without method are gossip with decimals