shipping is the most under-discussed thing on this board
shipping is the most under-discussed thing on this board. Not a hot take, just something I have not seen said plainly here. Clearance took three days and the carrier took nine. I had been blaming the wrong half for two years. Split one order across two months on purpose to compare summer and winter. Four days apart,…
Ordered from the warehouse in New Zealand instead of origin and the whole customs question disappeared. 12 days, door to door.
Ordered from the warehouse in New Zealand instead of origin and the whole customs question disappeared.
Adding the field everyone forgets — the month. Without it the report is not comparable to anything.
Same. SWB quoted 20 days on my lane and it landed at 8, which is exactly what you want from a quote.
Same.
This is why the lane table is organised the way it is. The supplier is not the unit.
reship policy in writing before you order
Correction: that was clearance time, not carrier time. The lane table separates them for exactly this reason.
Origin, destination, carrier and month?
[removed by moderator]
the lane is the unit of analysis, not the supplier
Ordered from the warehouse in New Zealand instead of origin and the whole customs question disappeared.
ismael_varga is right about regional stock. It changes the shape of the distribution, not just the mean.
Disagree. That is a customs hold, not a carrier delay, and lumping them together makes the lane table wrong.