[Meta] proposal — a flair for NHS posts
proposal — a flair for NHS posts, and here is what changes in practice if it goes ahead.
Four pharmacies, four prices, same product, same month. The spread was larger than I expected and none of them were the headline offer.
The online consultation asked me three questions, none of them about my history. I did not go ahead.
Discharged at goal back to the GP, who would not continue it. Nobody had mentioned that this was how it ends.
If somebody has the same thing measured a different way, post it next to mine and we will see whether they agree.
best — the order this archive was captured in
In England, specialist weight management services are commissioned locally, so eligibility criteria and waiting times differ by ICB. There is no single national threshold to quote.
Why the monthly pricing tracker works, and the rule that makes it work.
Members post the pharmacy, the product, the month and the price they actually paid — not an advertised offer, not a first-month discount. No links of any kind are permitted, which removes the entire incentive to post anything other than what happened.
The result is that the spread between pharmacies in a given month is visible, and it is consistently larger than people expect. That single table has saved members here more money than every other thread on the board combined, and it survives only because the no-links rule is enforced without exception.
specialist service, not GP, for tier 3 in most of England
Push back: a private prescription is a separate route, not a shortcut through the NHS queue.
private prescription pricing moves monthly and the pharmacy is most of the spread
Cosigning on discharge at goal. It catches people who have done everything right and did not know it was coming.
BMI thresholds vary by ICB and by year
ask the pharmacy for the price list, not the headline offer
ask the pharmacy for the price list, not the headline offer
Agreed — and keeping the letters with dates is what makes any later challenge possible.
the MHRA supply notices are published, read them before the panic threads
Yes — the consultation that asks nothing tells you what kind of service it is.
Two years and four months on a tier 3 list. Referral date and every letter kept, which turned out to matter when the service reorganised.
Referral link removed and the post left up. No links of any kind here, and that rule is not negotiable.
Supply notices from the regulator describe expected availability at a national level. They do not predict what any individual pharmacy has on the shelf next week.
Which nation, and which ICB if you are in England?
NHS pathway or private prescription?
NHS pathway or private prescription?
hassan_chowdhury is right that the two routes are separate. A private prescription does not move you up the list.
What did the referral letter actually say?
Is this a discharge back to the GP, or a discontinuation?
Concentrations can differ between products and between pharmacies. Switching mid-titration means redoing the arithmetic rather than carrying the old unit count across.
- 1Supply notices from the regulator describe expected availability at a…6 comments in this branch · started by u/dario_stanescu