GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Training] three full-body sessions a week through the whole cut — 19 comments in the full submission. View in context.
138
c/glp1muscle·submitted 5 days ago by u/lina_bruun

[Training] three full-body sessions a week through the whole cut

Trainingbranch of 6 comments

Something I keep coming back to: three full-body sessions a week through the whole cut. Hydration status and fasting state affect the lean mass estimate. Standardising both is the difference between a comparison and a coin toss. Reduced appetite makes hitting a protein target a logistics problem rather than a…

Read the full submission and all 19 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 4 days ago
u/rania_salinas12 points·4 days ago·edited

Some lean mass loss accompanies weight loss in any deficit. Resistance training and adequate protein intake are the two interventions with the best evidence for limiting the proportion.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lina_bruunOP-9 points·4 days ago·edited

Resistance training, and at what frequency?

replysharereportpermalink
u/lina_bruunOP7 points·4 days ago

How many weeks between the two scans?

replysharereportpermalink
u/oskar_kaufmann10 points·4 days ago

Nothing here is a training or nutrition prescription. Targets and programmes are matters for somebody who knows your history and your training background.

replysharereportpermalink
u/dario_stanescu5 points·3 days ago

the appetite effect makes eating enough protein a logistics problem

replysharereportpermalink
u/zeynep_villalobos5 points·4 days ago

Cosigning that protein gets harder precisely when appetite drops. That is the actual difficulty and it is logistical.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/glp1muscle

Lean-mass retention during rapid weight loss: protein targets, resistance-training minimums, DEXA and BIA measurement reality, FFMI tracking, and the sarcopenia question that nobody funded a proper trial for.

30kmembers
62submissions
Jun 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
More in c/glp1muscle
c/glp1muscle rules
  1. Body-composition claims need a method. Bathroom BIA scales are not a method.
  2. Protein targets in g/kg, not "lots".
  3. No supplement selling, no coaching solicitation.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/lift_heavy_thingsu/protein_first_pu/dexa_twice_yearlyu/sarcopenia_watch
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →