[Sceptic] the tendon claims outran the evidence by about a decade
the tendon claims outran the evidence by about a decade. It is the sort of thing everyone half-believes and nobody writes down. Every claim I could trace in this board went back to about four papers. That was a sobering afternoon. Bought small, tested identity first, and only then thought about anything else. That…
Do you have the mass spectrum?
Small fix — fifteen residues, not seventeen. The sequence is public and easy to check.
That claim traces back to a single preclinical paper that says something considerably narrower.
the tendon claims are the most repeated and the least evidenced
Correcting myself: I said the regulatory position had not changed and in that jurisdiction it has.
Yes. Nothing here is approved for human use and that should be the first line of every thread, not the last.