u/kofi_balogun
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Lagos.
member · joined 13 Apr 2025
Comments — page 2 of 2
comment on 3 months in and triple agonist is still the thing I get wrong in c/retatrutide · 0 points · 1 year ago
Same read.
Disagree with this specific inference. A 48-week readout does not tell you the shape of the curve after it.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify Mounjaro in c/tirzepatide · 0 points · 1 year ago
Research-use-only material is not approved for human use. Anything in this thread about how a research vial "should" titrate is a discussion about chemistry, not a plan.
comment on anyone else notice triple agonist kicking in around week 65 in c/retatrutide · 54 points · 1 year ago
Which phase 2 arm are you quoting, and at what week?
comment on anyone else notice triple agonist kicking in around week 65 in c/retatrutide · 75 points · 1 year ago
How fast was the escalation?
Disagree with this specific inference. A 48-week readout does not tell you the shape of the curve after it.
comment on baseline labs are the most under-discussed thing on this board in c/bloodwork · 476 points · 2 years ago
Substantial weight loss independently moves lipids, liver enzymes and several other markers. Attributing a change to a compound while losing weight is confounded by design.
comment on tirzepatide: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/tirzepatide · 1 points · 2 years ago
SURMOUNT-1 landed around 21% at 72 weeks on the top arm
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about ApoB until somebody posts a number in c/bloodwork · 21 points · 2 years ago
Small fix — a reference interval is not a treatment target, and the post above uses them interchangeably.
comment on [Lab] 2th independent test on BCH — 97.8% on a claimed 97.5%, and the trend is the interesting part in c/retatrutide · 845 points · 2 years ago
Small fix — three receptors, not two. GLP-1, GIP and glucagon, and the third one is the reason this compound gets its own board.
comment on retatrutide: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/retatrutide · 10 points · 2 years ago
the TRIUMPH programme is still running, so anything definitive is premature
comment on anyone else notice baseline labs kicking in around week 7 in c/bloodwork · 1 points · 2 years ago
Small fix — a reference interval is not a treatment target, and the post above uses them interchangeably.
comment on how much of what we believe about A1c actually comes from ferritin threads in c/bloodwork · 300 points · 2 years ago
Same lab as the previous draw?
comment on [Results] 66 weeks, 24kg, and triple agonist was the hard part in c/retatrutide · 4 points · 2 years ago
This. The phase 2 result was genuinely large and it was also 48 weeks in a few hundred people.
comment on week 19 check-in — 9kg down, early fullness manageable, one thing confusing me in c/retatrutide · 898 points · 2 years ago
Right, and it bears repeating that nothing here is approved anywhere and research material is not for human use.
comment on [Results] 45 weeks on 10mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 2 years ago
comparing reta phase 2 to sema phase 3 is comparing different things
comment on [Results] 45 weeks on 10mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/retatrutide · 5 points · 2 years ago
Sent a vial to VendorInvestigate out of curiosity. Result was 99.4% against a claimed 98.5%, which is the first independent number I had seen for this compound anywhere.