514
[Meta] the retatrutide rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining
the retatrutide rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining. Short post, long comment section, probably. Independent purity testing on this compound is…
u/careful_gradient_notes
Here for the tables, not the takes.
member · joined 10 May 2025
12,596post karma
3,617comment karma
5submissions
56comments
Overview — page 2 of 2
comment on stalled for 12 weeks at 10mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 1 year ago
triple agonist — GLP-1, GIP and glucagon, and the glucagon arm is the new part
comment on triple agonist: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 1 year ago
Careful with the rankings.
Agreed, and the glucagon arm is exactly why the comparison threads do not work.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify exit scam in c/scamalerts · 29 points · 1 year ago
never accuse an individual, describe what happened to you
comment on [Vendor] QSC vs Homopeptide on the same compound, same month — both cleared 98.5% in c/retatrutide · 112 points · 1 year ago
Correction: TRIUMPH is the phase 3 programme. The number you are quoting is from the phase 2 readout, which is a different trial.
comment on the fake COA question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/scamalerts · 55 points · 1 year ago
a shop that will only talk off-platform has told you something
comment on small win: dose escalation stopped being a problem at week 19 in c/retatrutide · 78 points · 1 year ago
What is the source for that figure — the published paper or a summary of it?
comment on reading tier 3 threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/glp1uk · 210 points · 1 year ago
Discharge from a specialist service at goal is a normal end point of that pathway. Whether prescribing continues in primary care afterwards is a local decision and is worth asking about at the start rather than at the end.
comment on [Meta] the retatrutide rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 1 year ago
That is body weight change, not fat mass. The trials report the first and people quote it as the second.
comment on [Meta] the retatrutide rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/retatrutide · 7 points · 1 year ago
Read the phase 2 paper twice before ordering anything. Recommend that to anyone in this board: the error bars are the interesting part.
comment on [Meta] the retatrutide rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/retatrutide · 12 points · 1 year ago
wait for phase 3 before you argue about rankings
comment on [Lab] 4th independent test on GGPeps — 97.9% on a claimed 97.5%, and the trend is the interesting part in c/scamalerts · 121 points · 1 year ago
Small fix — the name you are describing is in the wider-market table with almost nothing on file, not in the documented twenty.
comment on [Discussion] pharmacy is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/glp1uk · -33 points · 2 years ago
Did the consultation ask about history and medication?
comment on [Results] 26 weeks, 5kg, and dose escalation was the hard part in c/retatrutide · 37 points · 2 years ago
The thing that surprised me was how much of the discussion here is inference rather than measurement.
comment on [Lab] HJ tirz — Janoshik came back 97.4% against a claimed 97.0% in c/scamalerts · 37 points · 2 years ago
I would separate the two claims. The site being newly registered is checkable. The motive you are inferring is not.
comment on reading pricing threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/glp1uk · 9 points · 2 years ago
That is Scotland’s arrangement and the post is asking about England.
comment on [Lab] 2th independent test on BCH — 97.8% on a claimed 97.5%, and the trend is the interesting part in c/retatrutide · 461 points · 2 years ago
Correction: TRIUMPH is the phase 3 programme. The number you are quoting is from the phase 2 readout, which is a different trial.
comment on someone explain NHS to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/glp1uk · 226 points · 2 years ago
GP said no and specialist said yes is a very common sequence
278
[Discussion] the scam advice in here is 3 years out of date
The title is the argument: the scam advice in here is 3 years out of date. Here is the rest of it. Pulling the figures out of the title: 3 years. All of it is written…
comment on [Lab] split one vial across Medutest and Janoshik — 96.2% and 97.4% in c/scamalerts · 4 points · 2 years ago
report it here with dates, not adjectives
Agreed. Dates and documents make a report. Adjectives make a thread.
comment on unpopular opinion: most of what gets said here about glucagon is guesswork in c/retatrutide · 166 points · 2 years ago
dose escalation in the trials was slow for a reason