[Lab] split one vial across Medutest and Janoshik — 96.2% and 97.4%
split one vial across Medutest and Janoshik — 96.2% and 97.4%. I will put the method line and the batch identifier up front because that is what makes this checkable.
The relevant figures are 96.2% and 97.4%, and they come from the same log I have kept the whole time.
Domain age, registrar and certificate issuance date are all public and take about a minute to check. A site claiming years of history on a months-old domain is the cheapest signal available.
Cloned storefronts copy assets, layout and testimonial text. What they cannot easily copy is a batch-specific document that ties to a lot you can then have tested independently.
I will update this if the picture changes rather than quietly leaving it up.
best — the order this archive was captured in
The directory deliberately separates "we have nothing on this name" from "this went badly". Collapsing the two is how boards like this generate false certainty.
Correcting my own post: the payment date was the 14th, not the 4th. The gap is smaller than I made it sound.
group buys concentrate risk in one person and nobody plans for that
What is the exact domain, character for character?
Push back: "nobody has tested them" is a fact about this board, not a fact about the company. Say the first one.
This. Anything urging you to decide today is doing so for its own reasons.
Disagree with naming anyone on that basis. One person’s bad month is not a pattern and the sidebar exists for this exact reason.
That is an accusation about a named individual and it does not belong here in any form.
Is this a shop, a group buy, or an individual reseller? They fail in different ways.
Is this a shop, a group buy, or an individual reseller?
Disagreeing here: that is a delay, and this board has to keep delay and intent in separate columns.
Disagreeing here: that is a delay, and this board has to keep delay and intent in separate columns.
Adding the practical version: buy small from anyone new, test it, then decide.
Correction: that domain is one character different from the one you posted, which is rather the point of this thread.
Small fix — the name you are describing is in the wider-market table with almost nothing on file, not in the documented twenty.
A report is useful here when it carries dates, the exact domain, what was requested, what arrived and what did not. Everything else is atmosphere.
Ask for the batch-specific certificate before payment. Any operation with a quality system behind it can produce one; the request costs you nothing and it filters hard.
report it here with dates, not adjectives
report it here with dates, not adjectives
Agreed. Dates and documents make a report. Adjectives make a thread.
Agreed on the no-names rule. It protects the board and it protects people who turn out to be wrong.
the review page nobody can find on any other site is a warning
[deleted]
Not convinced. A payment window that closed is a payment window, not evidence of intent.
Reported something here with dates and screenshots and was asked for the document trail. Fair challenge, and it made the report worth reading.
check the domain character by character before you check anything else
Same. A batch-specific document requested before payment costs nothing and filters an enormous amount.
Merged into the standing thread for that domain so the reports sit in one place.
Group buys concentrate custody, payment and communication in one person with no structure behind it. That is not an accusation about anyone — it is a description of the risk shape.
Never name an individual. The sidebar rule exists because the cost of being wrong falls on a person and the benefit of being right falls on nobody in particular.
Has anyone else in the thread got the same domain in their history?
That is a report count, not a test count, and it changes how thin the evidence base actually is.
a cloned storefront copies the design, never the documentation
- 1A report is useful here when it carries dates, the exact domain, what was…11 comments in this branch · started by u/aleksi_marchand