Slightly embarrassed to be asking this, but: does anyone else get one good week and one flat week on repeat. reflux made the first fortnight rough at each step up, then…
u/bilal_osei
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Accra.
member · joined 11 Feb 2025
comment on the shortage list came off and my pharmacy stopped overnight in c/compounding · 2 points · 2 days ago
This. Compounded preparations carry no equivalence claim, and treating them as generics is a category error people make constantly.
comment on [Lab] two reta batches, two services, 98.4% and 97.9% in c/retatrutide · 55 points · 3 days ago
The sulphur burps profile felt different rather than worse. Hard to describe and impossible to quantify, so take it as an impression.
comment on the food noise going quiet is the part nobody warned me about in c/semaglutide · 43 points · 8 days ago
Cosigning. The appetite change and the scale change ran about three weeks apart for me too.
comment on why does everyone say week 4 is the wall in c/semaglutide · -46 points · 11 days ago
nausea that arrives on day two and fades by day four is the standard shape
comment on [Paper] amylin co-agonism is genuinely different pharmacology, not just more GLP-1 in c/glp1science · 130 points · 16 days ago
preclinical is not clinical and rodents are not small people
comment on is it normal to get muscle cramps at week 85 in c/retatrutide · 49 points · 21 days ago
Small fix — three receptors, not two. GLP-1, GIP and glucagon, and the third one is the reason this compound gets its own board.
comment on does anyone else get one good week and one flat week on repeat in c/semaglutide · 4 points · 1 months ago
My stall was eleven weeks. Eleven. Then it moved again without me changing anything at all.
comment on [Discussion] the telehealth advice in here is 3 years out of date in c/compounding · 28 points · 1 months ago
ask what the beyond-use date is based on
comment on [Meta] the 503A rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/compounding · 18 points · 1 months ago
Agreed. The 503A versus 503B distinction changes who is allowed to make what, and almost every confused thread here starts by ignoring it.
comment on incretin: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/glp1science · 2 points · 2 months ago
Agreed — the incretin effect is the load-bearing concept and everything downstream reads differently once you have it.
comment on incretin: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/glp1science · 44 points · 2 months ago
Agreed that receptor distribution is the key to the side-effect map. It is not a mystery, it is anatomy.
comment on does phase 2 actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/retatrutide · 558 points · 2 months ago
It is a triple agonist at the GLP-1, GIP and glucagon receptors. The glucagon arm is the genuinely novel component and it is the one with the least human outcome data behind it.
comment on does phase 2 actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/retatrutide · 130 points · 2 months ago
the TRIUMPH programme is still running, so anything definitive is premature
trialwatch_theo is right about the escalation being the variable. It explains most of the difficult reports here.
comment on the glucagon thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 2 months ago
small trial, big effect, wide error bars
comment on [Question] incretin — what am I missing here in c/glp1science · 14 points · 3 months ago
Read the primary paper after arguing about the summary for a fortnight. The discussion section said almost the opposite of what the thread had concluded.
comment on reading 503B threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/compounding · 40 points · 3 months ago
the pharmacy and the prescriber are two separate questions
comment on week 62 check-in — 12kg down, fatigue manageable, one thing confusing me in c/retatrutide · 32 points · 3 months ago
comparing reta phase 2 to sema phase 3 is comparing different things
comment on [Results] 19 weeks, 7kg, and food noise was the hard part in c/semaglutide · 41 points · 4 months ago
Research-use-only material is not approved for human use, so anything in this thread about how a compounded or research vial "should" behave is a chemistry discussion, not a dosing one.
comment on [Results] 19 weeks, 7kg, and food noise was the hard part in c/semaglutide · 23 points · 4 months ago
do not chase somebody else’s titration schedule, they are not you
comment on [Meta] the state board rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/compounding · -35 points · 6 months ago
What concentration is on the label, and does it match what you were expecting?
comment on genuine question about glucagon that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/retatrutide · 28 points · 6 months ago
Cosigning the escalation point. Almost every difficult report on this board is from somebody who went up quickly.
comment on titration is the most under-discussed thing on this board in c/semaglutide · 4 points · 6 months ago
Yes. Week 9 is when almost everybody writes the "is it still working" post, and almost everybody is fine.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for 2.4mg posts in c/semaglutide · 13 points · 7 months ago
do not chase somebody else’s titration schedule, they are not you
comment on [Results] 26 weeks on 1.7mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/retatrutide · 97 points · 7 months ago
the glucagon component is why the metabolic story reads differently
comment on [Discussion] the shortage list advice in here is 3 years out of date in c/compounding · 22 points · 8 months ago
Small fix — 503B facilities register with the regulator; 503A pharmacies are licensed by the state board. Different mechanisms.
comment on help me understand shortage list, I have read the wiki twice in c/compounding · 12 points · 8 months ago
Who is the prescriber, and are they the same organisation as the pharmacy?
comment on help me understand shortage list, I have read the wiki twice in c/compounding · 8 points · 8 months ago
compounded is not generic, there is no equivalence claim
comment on [Question] TRIUMPH — what am I missing here in c/retatrutide · 180 points · 9 months ago
The phase 2 readout ran to 48 weeks in a few hundred participants with a slow escalation. Both the size and the duration matter when people quote the headline number.
comment on my A1c moved and I cannot work out whether TRIUMPH is why in c/retatrutide · 27 points · 9 months ago
Push back: quoting the phase 2 headline as an expected outcome is not a fair reading of a small trial with wide intervals.
comment on the 503B thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/compounding · 0 points · 10 months ago
Disagree — a 503B being registered does not make its preparations equivalent to an approved product.
Agreed — and the follow-up question is what the beyond-use date is based on.
is it normal to get sulphur burps at week 87. Full detail below, and I have tried to keep the editorialising out of it. Stopped at a low step because there was no…
comment on appetite is the most under-discussed thing on this board in c/glp1science · 20 points · 11 months ago
a mechanism you can state is not a mechanism you have demonstrated
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring 503B at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/compounding · 23 points · 11 months ago
Right, and the concentration genuinely can differ from the branded product, which breaks people’s arithmetic.
comment on the TRIUMPH thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 1 year ago
The phase 2 readout ran to 48 weeks in a few hundred participants with a slow escalation.
liver_enzyme_liz is right about the escalation being the variable. It explains most of the difficult reports here.
comment on does compounding actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/compounding · 14 points · 1 year ago
Asked for potency testing on the finished preparation. They had it. I had assumed they would not.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about glucagon in c/retatrutide · 302 points · 1 year ago
The phase 2 readout ran to 48 weeks in a few hundred participants with a slow escalation. Both the size and the duration matter when people quote the headline number.
comment on the food noise question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/semaglutide · 1 points · 1 year ago
the ladder exists because the gut needs the time, not because the pharmacy likes paperwork
comment on the food noise question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/semaglutide · 43 points · 1 year ago
Does constipation track the day after the shot, or is it there all week?
comment on [Results] 37 weeks, 6kg, and weekly dosing was the hard part in c/semaglutide · 62 points · 1 year ago
sema is weekly for a reason, the half-life does the smoothing