the reship thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down
the reship thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down. It is the sort of thing everyone half-believes and nobody writes down. Asked ERP for the batch record on a Tuesday and had the full document, batch and method line, before the end of the day. That is the bar now. Sent the same compound from HJ and…
the wider-market names in the table are there because nobody has enough data on them
What a batch record should carry: the lot identifier, the date of analysis, the method including column and gradient, the individual related substances rather than a total, and the storage condition the stability statement was written against.
Started buying small deliberately, tested every lot for the first four, then stopped testing every lot because there was nothing to find.
consistency across lots beats one spectacular result
consistency across lots beats one spectacular result
Would qualify this slightly. Fewer entries means less sampling, and less sampling is not the same as a worse process.
Not convinced by the ranking-by-vibe approach here. The community number is derived from reports; your feeling is derived from four posts you remember.
registration number, then everything else
I would separate documentation from logistics. A supplier can be excellent at one and ordinary at the other, and averaging them hides it.
Lead time and minimum quantity are the two facts people forget to ask for and then argue about later. Both are answerable in one email before you commit.