[PSA] reship is not what most of this community thinks it is
Putting this at the top of the board where it belongs: reship is not what most of this community thinks it is.
Lead time and minimum quantity are the two facts people forget to ask for and then argue about later. Both are answerable in one email before you commit.
Inter-lab variance on this assay runs a point or two either way. Two services disagreeing by that much is agreement, not a discrepancy, and treating it otherwise starts pointless arguments.
The wider-market rows in the directory carry a band and a report count and nothing else, deliberately. Anything more would be manufacturing precision that the evidence does not support.
I will update this if the picture changes rather than quietly leaving it up.
best — the order this archive was captured in
A certificate with a purity figure and no method line is not falsifiable. You cannot reproduce it, you cannot check it, and it tells you nothing about how the number was produced.
A certificate with a purity figure and no method line is not falsifiable.
Adding the practical version: ask for lead time, minimum quantity and the batch record in the same message. Three answers, one email.
[removed by moderator]
Agreed on buying small first. The cost of a test is small next to the cost of committing to a supplier you have not checked.
Did the lot code on the vial match the paperwork?
Regional stock made more difference to my planning than anything else — ordering from a warehouse in New Zealand took the customs question off the table entirely.
Regional stock made more difference to my planning than anything else — ordering from a warehouse in New Zealand took the customs question off the tab
This is the whole method in one sentence. Everything else in the thread is elaboration.
Not convinced by the ranking-by-vibe approach here. The community number is derived from reports; your feeling is derived from four posts you remember.
the lot on the vial has to match the lot on the certificate, every time
Amino Asylum shows up in threads constantly and has almost nothing on file
Minimum order and lead time — did they quote both up front?
Regional stock made more difference to my planning than anything else — ordering from a warehouse in New Zealand took the customs question off the tab
janoshik_junkie is describing the batch record test and it is the fastest signal available before you spend anything.
That is a report count, not a test count. The table lists both and they are very different numbers.
I would separate documentation from logistics. A supplier can be excellent at one and ordinary at the other, and averaging them hides it.
Yes. Spread across lots is the number that tells you about the process. A single high result tells you about a vial.
Careful. "Nobody has tested Risynth Bio" is a statement about this board, not about the supplier. Say the first thing, not the second.
Flair set to Vendor. Also a reminder that we take no money from any supplier in the directory.
Yes, and the reason the wider-market table has no scores is that a score built on two reports would be a lie with a decimal point.
Where a supplier holds regional stock, ask which lines are actually held there rather than drop-shipped. It changes the lead time and it changes the customs question.
- 1Regional stock made more difference to my planning than anything else —…10 comments in this branch · started by u/janoshik_junkie