GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of intent-to-treat vs per-protocol explains half the arguments on this site — 18 comments in the full submission. View in context.
233
c/trialwatch·submitted 13 days ago by u/anders_vermeulen

intent-to-treat vs per-protocol explains half the arguments on this site

Readoutbranch of 11 comments

intent-to-treat vs per-protocol explains half the arguments on this site. Change my mind, genuinely — I have no stake in being right about this. On means, which this board treats as targets and which are nothing of the sort. A reported mean body weight change is the centre of a distribution that in these trials is…

Read the full submission and all 18 comments →

This branch

11 comments, started 12 days ago
u/joaquin_trevino21 points·12 days ago

Push back: an open-label extension tells you about the people who stayed. That is a different question.

replysharereportpermalink
u/draw_up_dizzy16 points·12 days ago

This. Intention-to-treat versus completer analysis routinely moves the headline by several points.

replysharereportpermalink
u/tb500_tangent-15 points·11 days ago

Which trial, and which arm?

replysharereportpermalink
u/eu_apotheke_a1 point·11 days ago

FLOW was kidney outcomes and it is the one nobody quotes

replysharereportpermalink
u/iman_castellanos1 point·11 days ago

Cosigning on discontinuation. It is a result about tolerability and it gets buried every time.

replysharereportpermalink
u/anders_vermeulenOP10 points·11 days ago

the confidence interval is the finding, the point estimate is the headline

replysharereportpermalink
u/anders_vermeulenOP6 points·11 days ago

That is the 68-week readout, not the 72-week one. Different trial, different duration.

replysharereportpermalink
u/hsa_math2 points·11 days ago

STEP is semaglutide obesity, SURMOUNT is tirzepatide obesity, they are not interchangeable

replysharereportpermalink
u/rohan_cardoso2 points·11 days ago

a press release is not a publication

replysharereportpermalink
u/anders_vermeulenOP30 points·12 days ago

How long was the randomised phase before any extension?

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]22 points·12 days ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/trialwatch

Clinical trial reading group. New readouts, protocol amendments, endpoint definitions, dropout handling, and the difference between a press release and a publication. Absolute risk reduction and number-needed-to-treat are house dialect here.

34kmembers
95submissions
Nov 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/trialwatch rules
  1. Press-release-only posts must be flaired Press Release until a publication exists.
  2. Give the trial name, phase, n, and primary endpoint in the body.
  3. Relative risk reduction alone is not a result. Show the absolute numbers.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.