SELECT: what the trials say vs what this community says
The title is the argument: SELECT: what the trials say vs what this community says. Here is the rest of it. Intention-to-treat analyses everybody randomised regardless of what they did afterwards. Completer analyses only those who finished. The second is systematically more flattering and both are legitimate if…
Same. A press release is a claim about a result; the publication is the result.
That is the 68-week readout, not the 72-week one. Different trial, different duration.
Discontinuation rates are a tolerability result. A trial with a strong efficacy number and heavy discontinuation is telling you two things and people only quote one.
What did the confidence interval look like?
SURPASS is the diabetes programme and reports glycaemic endpoints