three years of SURMOUNT threads, summarised so you do not have to read them
Something I keep coming back to: three years of SURMOUNT threads, summarised so you do not have to read them. Cardiovascular outcome trials are powered for events, not for weight, and are typically run in a different population with different inclusion criteria. Reading a weight number out of one is reading a…
Spent an evening with the appendix tables and found the subgroup detail that the entire thread had been speculating about.
The press release said that; the publication says something more hedged. Worth reading both.
a mean is not a promise
a mean is not a promise
first_hundred is right about the programme names. They are different populations with different endpoints.
check who the comparator was before you compare anything
discontinuation rate is a result, not a footnote
Retitled: the original quoted a diabetes endpoint as an obesity result.
Retitled: the original quoted a diabetes endpoint as an obesity result.
This is the distinction that would end about half the arguments on this board.