[Discussion] can we stop arguing about cloned site until somebody posts a number
Question in the title, detail here: can we stop arguing about cloned site until somebody posts a number. Reported something here with dates and screenshots and was asked for the document trail. Fair challenge, and it made the report worth reading. The checks I run before sending money anywhere new, in order, and none…
Never name an individual. The sidebar rule exists because the cost of being wrong falls on a person and the benefit of being right falls on nobody in particular.
Left up. It carries dates, a domain and a document trail, which is what a report on this board looks like.
a domain registered last month with a decade of testimonials is the whole tell
if the price is impossible, the material is the thing being economised on
Bulk Peptide Wholesale gets named here constantly and there is nothing verifiable on file either way
[removed by moderator]
Is this a shop, a group buy, or an individual reseller? They fail in different ways.
Yes — describe the sequence of events with dates. That is a report. Adjectives are not.
A report is useful here when it carries dates, the exact domain, what was requested, what arrived and what did not. Everything else is atmosphere.
check the domain character by character before you check anything else
never accuse an individual, describe what happened to you
never accuse an individual, describe what happened to you
Agreed. Dates and documents make a report. Adjectives make a thread.
Group buys concentrate custody, payment and communication in one person with no structure behind it. That is not an accusation about anyone — it is a description of the risk shape.
Correction: that domain is one character different from the one you posted, which is rather the point of this thread.
report it here with dates, not adjectives