GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
732
c/progresspics·posted 3 months ago by u/sigrid_kaufmann

[PSA] timeframe is not what most of this community thinks it is

Results Clean Column ×5

The one-line version is the title: timeframe is not what most of this community thinks it is. The rest is why.

Nobody noticed for months. Then several people noticed in the same fortnight, which was strange and quite nice.

Why this board is text only, since new members ask every week.

A photograph invites comparison on things nobody can control — lighting, posture, where you carry weight, what you looked like before any of this. Text invites description of what changed for you: the jacket, the stairs, the measurement, the month it took.

The result is a board where the posts are about people’s actual experience rather than about images, and where nobody is competing on the wrong axis. It was a deliberate choice, it has been challenged periodically, and every time it has been kept.

The boring middle lasted the longest and it is the part I am most proud of.

Screenshot none of this. Read the whole thread, including the parts where I am told I am wrong.

971 up / 239 down80% upvoted61 commentsid m1qx9x30 Apr 2026

61 comments

23 in this archive, depth 5

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/yara_antonsen135 points·2 months ago

Circumference measurements often continue changing during a scale plateau because composition changes are not visible on a bathroom scale.

replysharereportpermalink
u/gentle_correctionMOD81 points·2 months ago

Removed an image link. This board is text only by community rule and that has been reaffirmed twice.

replysharereportpermalink
u/week_two_confused_202660 points·2 months ago

Removed an image link.

Agreed — measurements over photographs, every time, for anybody trying to actually track something.

replysharereportpermalink
u/placebo_arm_pam80 points·3 months ago

Rate of change is not a virtue. Slower trajectories are as durable as fast ones and are considerably better represented on this board than the front page suggests.

replysharereportpermalink
u/nayeli_iyer43 points·3 months ago

How are you keeping track — spreadsheet, notebook, nothing?

replysharereportpermalink
u/nadia_norgaard11 points·3 months ago

Yes. Clothes fitting differently arrives well before the scale acknowledges anything.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rasmus_kimani4 points·3 months ago

Cosigning on timeframe. "17kg" means something completely different over 13 months than over one.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ismael_eriksen31 points·3 months ago

Small correction, kindly meant: that is a range rather than a regain. Weight moves day to day in everybody.

replysharereportpermalink
u/injection_site_iris10 points·2 months ago

text only here, by community rule, and it works better than you would think

replysharereportpermalink
u/hassan_chowdhury43 points·3 months ago

Agreed — text only was the best rule this board ever adopted. The posts are about what actually changed rather than about lighting.

replysharereportpermalink
u/blunt_coldbox32 points·3 months ago

Agreed — text only was the best rule this board ever adopted.

Slight disagreement: that is a month, not a plateau, and calling it one makes it heavier than it is.

replysharereportpermalink
u/runa_cabrera33 points·2 months ago

non-scale victories count and they are the ones people remember

replysharereportpermalink
u/plain_titration66 points·2 months ago

My goal weight at week one was a number I made up. I have revised it twice since and I am happier for it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/jarno_adebayo36 points·3 months ago

Agreed that goal weights picked at the start are guesses. Mine was, and I revised it twice.

replysharereportpermalink
u/andres_restrepo28 points·3 months ago

Weighing under consistent conditions — same time, same state, same scale — removes most of the apparent variability people find distressing.

replysharereportpermalink
u/spreadsheet_gremlindata14 points·3 months ago

goal weights chosen at week one are usually guesses

replysharereportpermalink
u/farid_kuipers17 points·3 months ago

Same. Comparison ruined about three months for me until I stopped reading the fastest posts.

replysharereportpermalink
u/vial_math_verasyringe math15 points·3 months ago

On the goal weight you set in week one.

You chose it with the least information you will ever have about how this feels, what is sustainable, and what your body does at different points. Revising it is not moving the goalposts; it is updating a prediction, which is what you are supposed to do with predictions.

Several of the longest-standing members here have revised theirs more than once, in both directions, and describe the revision as the point at which the whole thing became manageable. What the number should be is a conversation with somebody who knows your history — but that it is allowed to change is something this board can tell you.

replysharereportpermalink
u/sigrid_kaufmannOP8 points·2 months ago

Did the clothes change before the number did for you too?

replysharereportpermalink
u/spreadsheet_gremlindata7 points·2 months ago

I would not treat a two-kilo range as a regain. Weight varies day to day in everybody.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rosa_almeida4 points·2 months ago

I would not treat a two-kilo range as a regain.

spreadsheet_gremlin is right that the clothes tell you before the scale does.

replysharereportpermalink
u/reta_and_regret2 points·2 months ago

the timeframe matters as much as the number

replysharereportpermalink
u/greta_nilsen6 points·2 months ago

waist is the measurement that keeps moving during a scale stall

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/progresspics

Progress posts with no images, by design. Starting point, current point, timeframe, dose history, what changed besides the scale. Text-only removes the comparison trap, the body-shaming pile-on and the entire question of who owns a photo of your torso.

51kmembers
62submissions
May 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/progresspics rules
  1. No images. None. Not even redacted ones. This is the whole point of the community.
  2. Include timeframe and starting point or it reads as a brag with no information.
  3. No commenting on anybody's body. Comment on the process.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.