GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
885
c/progresspics·posted 8 months ago by u/gastric_emptying_g

does non-scale victory actually matter or is it forum lore at this point

Discussion Slow Clap ×4

does non-scale victory actually matter or is it forum lore at this point. I am not trying to be the "source?" guy. I would just like a source.

Why this board is text only, since new members ask every week.

A photograph invites comparison on things nobody can control — lighting, posture, where you carry weight, what you looked like before any of this. Text invites description of what changed for you: the jacket, the stairs, the measurement, the month it took.

The result is a board where the posts are about people’s actual experience rather than about images, and where nobody is competing on the wrong axis. It was a deliberate choice, it has been challenged periodically, and every time it has been kept.

What to measure if you want to stay sane through the flat parts.

Weight, under consistent conditions, no more than weekly. Waist, monthly — it frequently keeps moving when the scale does not. And one non-scale thing a week written down: a garment, a staircase, a distance, an ordinary task that got easier.

A year of those three is a far better record than a year of daily weights, and reading the third column back is the part that actually means something. The daily number is noise dressed up as information, and it has ruined more months on this board than any plateau.

On the goal weight you set in week one.

You chose it with the least information you will ever have about how this feels, what is sustainable, and what your body does at different points. Revising it is not moving the goalposts; it is updating a prediction, which is what you are supposed to do with predictions.

Several of the longest-standing members here have revised theirs more than once, in both directions, and describe the revision as the point at which the whole thing became manageable. What the number should be is a conversation with somebody who knows your history — but that it is allowed to change is something this board can tell you.

Sceptical readings welcome. The confident ones are the ones I distrust.

1,004 up / 119 down89% upvoted45 commentsid l7lt722 Dec 2025

45 comments

26 in this archive, depth 4

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/hassan_chowdhury141 points·7 months ago

Rate of change is not a virtue. Slower trajectories are as durable as fast ones and are considerably better represented on this board than the front page suggests.

replysharereportpermalink
u/thyroid_tangent-15 points·7 months ago

Careful — that reads as advice about what someone else should do, and this board is for describing your own.

replysharereportpermalink
u/vial_math_verasyringe math1 point·7 months ago

30kg over 13 months and honestly the most useful marker was that stairs stopped being a decision.

replysharereportpermalink
u/still_here_2026MOD77 points·7 months ago

Nobody has to post a starting weight, and comments demanding one get removed.

replysharereportpermalink
u/nadia_norgaard25 points·7 months ago

Right — the non-scale victories are the ones I remember. The numbers all blur together after a while.

replysharereportpermalink
u/santiago_szabo49 points·7 months ago·edited

Weighing under consistent conditions — same time, same state, same scale — removes most of the apparent variability people find distressing.

replysharereportpermalink
u/gastric_emptying_gOP32 points·7 months ago

the first person to notice was me, months after it started

replysharereportpermalink
u/maren_ibarra39 points·7 months ago

celebrate the boring milestones, they are the durable ones

replysharereportpermalink
u/rasmus_kuipers23 points·7 months ago

Push back on the goal number. You chose it before you knew what any of this felt like.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lina_ndiaye18 points·7 months ago

Yes. Clothes fitting differently arrives well before the scale acknowledges anything.

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]7 points·7 months ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink
u/rasmus_mensah4 points·7 months ago

Not convinced comparison helps here. The people posting the fastest results are the tail of a distribution, not the middle.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lucia_bruun5 points·7 months ago

Nothing on this board is medical advice, and rate, target and method are questions for somebody who knows your history.

replysharereportpermalink
u/greta_perrin3 points·7 months ago

Cosigning on timeframe. "18kg" means something completely different over 12 months than over one.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lucia_bruun15 points·7 months ago

comparison is the thief of everything on a board like this

replysharereportpermalink
u/rasmus_kuipers5 points·7 months ago

text only here, by community rule, and it works better than you would think

replysharereportpermalink
u/due_diligence_dee4 points·7 months ago

Gently disagree with the framing — that is not a plateau, that is a month. They are different things.

replysharereportpermalink
u/wanjiru_osei3 points·7 months ago

Stalled for 4 weeks and measured my waist out of stubbornness. It had moved. The scale had not.

replysharereportpermalink
u/zofia_lindholm2 points·7 months ago

This. Waist measurement kept moving through my longest stall and it was the only thing that kept me sane.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lina_ndiaye11 points·7 months ago

The boring middle lasted the longest and it is the part I am most proud of.

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (1) →
u/honest_syringe339 points·7 months ago

Same. Comparison ruined about three months for me until I stopped reading the fastest posts.

replysharereportpermalink
u/wanjiru_osei4 points·7 months ago

Body weight varies by a couple of kilos day to day through fluid, glycogen and gut content, which is why a single weigh-in is noise and a fortnightly trend is signal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/hsa_math3 points·7 months ago

Text-only posting removes the comparison mechanism that makes image boards difficult, which is why this community adopted the rule and has kept it.

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (2) →
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/progresspics

Progress posts with no images, by design. Starting point, current point, timeframe, dose history, what changed besides the scale. Text-only removes the comparison trap, the body-shaming pile-on and the entire question of who owns a photo of your torso.

51kmembers
62submissions
May 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com
Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
c/progresspics rules
  1. No images. None. Not even redacted ones. This is the whole point of the community.
  2. Include timeframe and starting point or it reads as a brag with no information.
  3. No commenting on anybody's body. Comment on the process.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.