GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of help me understand moderation, I have read the wiki twice — 13 comments in the full submission. View in context.
-48
c/meta·submitted 2 years ago by u/discount_math_dm

help me understand moderation, I have read the wiki twice

Metabranch of 6 comments

help me understand moderation, I have read the wiki twice — that is what I am asking, and I have already read the wiki twice. Moderation of individual cases happens in modmail rather than in threads, because a public discussion of one person’s removal is worse for that person than a private one. A rule-change…

Read the full submission and all 13 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 2 years ago
u/milos_trevino3 points·2 years ago

Same view — strict evidence rules make this board slower and make the archive worth reading in three years.

replysharereportpermalink
u/dario_ibarra2 points·2 years ago

Agreed that the top comment is not the best answer. The ranking optimises for early agreement.

replysharereportpermalink
u/discount_math_dmOP1 point·2 years ago

What breaks if we make that change?

replysharereportpermalink
u/cloudy_vial_carol1 point·2 years ago

Push back: the ranking is not hiding anything. The formula is published and you can reproduce the ordering.

replysharereportpermalink
u/camila_marchand1 point·2 years ago

the disclosure is boring because it has to be

replysharereportpermalink
u/discount_math_dm1 point·2 years ago

This. Modmail first is not bureaucracy; it stops individual cases turning into a public pile-on.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.