GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Meta] the moderation rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining — 22 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.2k
c/meta·submitted 6 months ago by u/milos_trevino

[Meta] the moderation rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining

Metabranch of 7 comments

the moderation rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining. Nothing about this affects the ranking maths, before anyone asks. Funding and links, in full, because the question deserves a straight answer. Sponsor units are labelled as sponsored. Each vendor source page carries one outbound link to that…

Read the full submission and all 22 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 6 months ago
u/copay_card_cc38 points·6 months ago·edited

Moderation of individual cases happens in modmail rather than in threads, because a public discussion of one person’s removal is worse for that person than a private one.

replysharereportpermalink
u/sanne_novak32 points·6 months ago

sponsor disclosure is on the about page in full

replysharereportpermalink
u/emil_marchand10 points·6 months ago

rule-change proposals need a concrete wording, not a complaint

replysharereportpermalink
u/bastian_moreau4 points·6 months ago

Right, and the storefront links on source pages are marked and disclosed, which is the honest way to do it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ewan_marchand20 points·6 months ago·edited

Is this about a policy or about an individual removal?

replysharereportpermalink
u/milos_trevinoOP12 points·6 months ago

Correcting my own comment above: the proposal was adopted with an amendment, not as written.

replysharereportpermalink
u/wanjiru_osei32 points·6 months ago

no referral links, no affiliate links, not once

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/meta
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/hub_opsu/mod_ambulatoryu/rulebook_rachaelu/quiet_moderator
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →