GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of is it normal to get early fullness at week 90 — 43 comments in the full submission. View in context.
3.1k
c/maintenancephase·submitted 12 months ago by u/cesar_oyelaran

is it normal to get early fullness at week 90

Resultsbranch of 6 comments

is it normal to get early fullness at week 90, logged the same way every week so the comparison is at least internally fair. Body weight varies by a couple of kilos over days in stable people through fluid, glycogen and gut content. A range is not a trend. Withdrawal studies in this class consistently show…

Read the full submission and all 43 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 12 months ago
u/graph_it_gary66 points·12 months ago

Chased the last three kilos with a dose increase and got a fortnight of sulphur burps and no change in the number.

replysharereportpermalink
u/brigade_detector22 points·12 months ago

Same. Monthly is plenty at this stage and daily weighing made me miserable for no information gain.

replysharereportpermalink
u/graph_it_gary18 points·12 months ago

maintenance is where the logistics finally get boring, which is the point

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (3) →

← back to the whole thread

About c/maintenancephase

The part nobody posts about: what happens at goal weight. Finding a lowest effective dose, dose-interval stretching, regain risk data, muscle retention, the psychology of not having a number to chase, and staying on indefinitely versus tapering.

39kmembers
95submissions
Dec 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/maintenancephase rules
  1. State how long you have been at maintenance. "Maintenance" at week 30 is not maintenance.
  2. Regain is not a moral failing and posts implying it is get removed.
  3. Dose-stretching experiences welcome; dose-stretching instructions are not.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.