reading test results threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly
The title is the argument: reading test results threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly. Here is the rest of it. Have now spent more on testing than on some of the orders. No regrets — the log is the reason I can buy without agonising. First result I ever posted here got asked for the batch number and the claim.…
The template is vendor, compound, batch, service, claim, result, and who paid. Every one of those fields exists because a result missing it has been argued about here before.
What was the claim on the certificate you are comparing against?
inter-lab variance runs a point or two, plan your outrage accordingly
Small fix — same supplier, different lot. The two rows in the log are not the same batch.
Agreed — the template exists because a result without the batch and the claim is unanchored.
I would not post that as a finding. It is a single result and the template asks you to say so.
three lots beats three tests on one lot
Kept every report as a PDF with the batch in the filename. Two years in, it is the most useful folder I own.
Correction: that is the claimed figure, and the measured one is the higher of the two in your own screenshot.