the test results thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down
The title is the argument: the test results thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down. Here is the rest of it. If the report gives a mass spectrum as well as UV purity, say so. Identity and relative quantity are separate claims and the log tracks both. Date of analysis anchors the result to a…
The template is vendor, compound, batch, service, claim, result, and who paid. Every one of those fields exists because a result missing it has been argued about here before.
The template is vendor, compound, batch, service, claim, result, and who paid.
Disagreeing with this line: that gap is ordinary variance, not a contradiction between the lab and the certificate.
the trend across lots is worth more than any single figure
Batch number and date of analysis?
Which service, and did you pay for it yourself?
Careful with the trend claim. Four results over two years is a very sparse series to draw a line through.
I would not post that as a finding. It is a single result and the template asks you to say so.