[Meta] proposal — a flair for PeptideMeter posts
Housekeeping: proposal — a flair for PeptideMeter posts. How to build a series that means something, if you are going to spend money on testing anyway. Three tests on one lot tells you about your measurement. Three tests on three lots, spread over a year, tells you about a process. The second is the one worth paying…
Date of analysis anchors the result to a manufacturing period. A two-year-old result is evidence about two years ago and should be read that way.
Is that the same lot as the one in the thread from last month?
Yes. Two services on the same batch is the strongest thing an individual member can produce, and it is not expensive.
the trend across lots is worth more than any single figure
GL Biochem BPC, batch matched the paperwork, Medutest came back 97.2% against a claimed 97.0%. Paid for it myself, posting it because the log is only worth anything if people do.
Cosigning on saying who paid. It is the whole basis on which this log is worth anything.
Cosigning on saying who paid.
This is why the template has a batch field. Without it the result is about a vial nobody can identify.
if you are going to test, test the thing you actually received
Date of analysis anchors the result to a manufacturing period.
teodor_jansen is right that the band matters more than the peak. Consistency across lots is the finding.