[Lab] split one vial across VendorInvestigate and PeptideMeter — 99.1% and 96.8%
The claim in the title is exactly the claim I am making: split one vial across VendorInvestigate and PeptideMeter — 99.1% and 96.8%. Nothing implied beyond it. Numbers, in the order they matter: 99.1% and 96.8%. What a result posted here is actually worth, and how to make yours worth more. A single figure with no…
Area percent and net peptide content are different measurements and most reports give one. Quote which, or the comparison downstream is meaningless.
Merged with the other thread on the same batch so the results sit together.
three lots beats three tests on one lot
The template is vendor, compound, batch, service, claim, result, and who paid. Every one of those fields exists because a result missing it has been argued about here before.
three lots beats three tests on one lot
yara_mensah is right that the band matters more than the peak. Consistency across lots is the finding.
Cosigning on saying who paid. It is the whole basis on which this log is worth anything.