does prior authorization actually matter or is it forum lore at this point
The title is the whole question — does prior authorization actually matter or is it forum lore at this point — but here is why I am asking.
New plan year, entirely new criteria, and the denial that had been immovable in the autumn simply did not apply in January.
Peer-to-peer took fifteen minutes and resolved something a written appeal had been sitting on for a month.
Missed a deadline because I counted from when I opened the envelope. That mistake cost me an entire cycle.
If somebody has the same thing measured a different way, post it next to mine and we will see whether they agree.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Internal appeals are decided by the plan. External review is decided by an independent body and, where it applies, its determination is binding. They are separate mechanisms and the second is chronically underused.
Push back: your plan is an employer plan, which changes both the appeal path and who the regulator is.
deadlines run from the letter date, not from when you opened it
Not convinced. That is a formulary exclusion rather than a prior authorisation denial, and the route to challenge it is different.
Not convinced.
Adding the underused one — external review. Independent, binding where it applies, and hardly anybody gets that far.
What is the appeal deadline on the letter?
I would not skip the peer-to-peer. It is often the fastest route and it costs a phone call.
the diagnosis code on the claim is doing more work than anything you write
Careful — the deadline runs from the date on the letter. Waiting for a call back can cost you the appeal entirely.
This. Step therapy is a paperwork requirement and it is beaten with documentation, not persuasion.
Prior authorisation criteria are republished each plan year. A criterion that blocked you in one year may not exist in the next, so a denial is worth retesting after the turnover.
the second-level appeal is where things actually turn
Appeal deadlines run from the date on the determination letter. They are strict, they are short, and a missed deadline usually forfeits that level entirely.
That criterion is from the previous plan year. The current bulletin has different wording.
Correction: that is a formulary exclusion, not a prior authorisation denial. Different form, different route, different deadline.
That advice is jurisdiction-specific and this board spans several. Say where you are.
- 1This. Step therapy is a paperwork requirement and it is beaten with…6 comments in this branch · started by u/edit_for_clarity